Bug 1535229

Summary:	[RFE] Retirements Need a Unique Service ID in Logs and Web UI
Product:	Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine	Reporter:	myoder
Component:	Automate	Assignee:	Tina Fitzgerald <tfitzger>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:	Antonin Pagac <apagac>
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	5.8.0	CC:	apagac, cpelland, mkanoor, obarenbo, smallamp, tfitzger
Target Milestone:	MVP	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	5.10.0
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	5.10.0.0	Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-02-07 23:00:57 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:	1599299
Bug Blocks:	1555371

Description myoder 2018-01-16 21:42:58 UTC

Description of problem:

Retirements do not currently have Service IDs like Lifecycle and Service Provisioning.  Giving retirements a unique ID will make it easier to track retirements in the logs and/or in the Web UI.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
all

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.
2.
3.

Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

This request is for the CloudForms Support Team to help troubleshoot retirement issues.

Comment 2 Greg McCullough 2018-04-24 20:36:26 UTC

Enhancement done in PR https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq/pull/17013

Comment 3 Antonin Pagac 2018-07-09 15:34:22 UTC

Appliance version: 5.10.0.3

"service_template_provision_request" and "service_template_provision_task" and also "miq_provision" are now prefixed with the letter 'r' plus 'request_id'.

However, there is bz 1599299 and I can't verify how it looks upon service retirement, which is what this BZ talks about. Going to mark this as FAILED_QA until the upper mentioned BZ is resolved, then will retest.

Comment 4 Tina Fitzgerald 2018-08-10 10:44:18 UTC

Hi Antonin,

The above referenced BZ has been verified. Can you retest?

Thanks,
Tina

Comment 5 Antonin Pagac 2018-08-16 08:11:01 UTC

appliance version: 5.10.0.8.

"vm_retire_task" and "service_retire_task" are also prefixed. This works fine.

Comment 6 errata-xmlrpc 2019-02-07 23:00:57 UTC

Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0212