Bug 1535820

Summary: [RFE] Allow Union/Intersection Actions on Host Collections
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Onkar <omankame>
Component: Host CollectionsAssignee: satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.2.12CC: bkearney, jpriddy
Target Milestone: UnspecifiedKeywords: FutureFeature
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-01-18 19:57:57 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Onkar 2018-01-18 07:27:36 UTC 
Description of problem: Ability to use union and intersection operations between large host collections. 


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):6.2


How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1.In All Version
2.
3.

Actual results: On multiple hosts collections not able to perform union and intersection operation in easy way.


Expected results:From the host collections view (Hosts > Host Collections), allow the ability to select multiple host collections, and have a button for a union of host collections (OR filter) or an intersection of host collections (AND filter).  E.g. host_collection1 = system1, system2, host_collection2 = system1, system2, system3.  Union = system1, system2, system3, Intersection = system1, system2


Additional info: Currently,  a workaround using content host filters in the search box (e.g. host_collection = host_collection1 AND host_collection = host_collection2), with the ability to save the bookmarks, but this would correlate to bookmarks in order to meet granularity needs.  This is not ideal, and customer would like it implemented via a supported and usable means within the UI.
Comment 1 Bryan Kearney 2018-01-18 19:57:57 UTC 
Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and we do not expect this to be implemented in product in the forseeable future. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please feel free to contact Rich Jerrido or Bryan Kearney. Thank you.