Bug 153743
Summary: | Contact Management online doc is incorrect; LDAP setup instructions are wrong | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4 | Reporter: | Howard Owen <hbo> | ||||
Component: | evolution | Assignee: | Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | |||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||
Version: | 4.0 | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | All | ||||||
OS: | Linux | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | RHBA-2006-0002 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | ||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2006-03-07 18:31:26 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 168429 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Howard Owen
2005-04-05 15:31:00 UTC
Thanks for this bug report. Yes, the 2.0 documentation is describing the old Evolution 1.4 (RHEL 3) way of configuring LDAP addressbook access. I've checked and this mistake is still present in the very latest documentation from upstream (Evolution 2.3). I've filed this bug about the documentation upstream: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=314804 Created attachment 120825 [details]
Proposed patch to the documentation
Attached patch:
(i) entirely removes the "config-prefs-contact" section (and references to it),
since the information there is either a poorly written duplicate of information
available elsewhere in the document, or is wrong
(ii) fills out the section on configuring LDAP with fresh information, based
upon how the dialog actually looks in RHEL4, whilst attemptint to stay true to
the style of markup in the rest of the documentation
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem described in this bug report. This report is therefore being closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information on the solution and/or where to find the updated files, please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report if the solution does not work for you. http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2006-0002.html |