Bug 1538346

Summary:	dnf package groups contain missing packages
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	W Agtail <crash70>
Component:	comps	Assignee:	Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	28	CC:	dmach, ignatenko, kevin, mhatina, packaging-team-maint, rpm-software-management, vmukhame, vpavlin
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-03-03 21:50:37 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description W Agtail 2018-01-24 21:28:09 UTC

Description of problem:
The following dnf package groups list invalid packages:
base-x
mate-desktop

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
Fedora release 28 (Rawhide)

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. dnf groupinstall base-x
2. dnf groupinstall mate-desktop
3.

Actual results:
dnf groupinstall base-x
No match for group package "xorg-x11-drv-armsoc"
No match for group package "xorg-x11-drv-omap"

dnf groupinstall mate-desktop
No match for group package "dnfdragora-gui"

Expected results:
To have no errors

Additional info:
Could the above mentioned missing packages either be removed from the package groups or make the packages available?

Many thanks.

Comment 1 Daniel Mach 2018-01-31 12:14:07 UTC

This is a problem with comps.xml in repodata, it contains RPMs that are not available in repos.

Comment 2 Fedora End Of Life 2018-02-20 15:28:58 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 28 development cycle.
Changing version to '28'.

Comment 3 Kevin Fenzi 2018-03-03 21:50:37 UTC

Well, 2 of those are only available are arm/aarch64, so there's nothing we can do in comps about that I don't think. 

The last one I have filed a PR to fix: 
https://pagure.io/fedora-comps/pull-request/225

If you feel the others should be addressed, feel free to re-open and reassign back to dnf.

Comment 4 Igor Gnatenko 2018-03-04 05:15:50 UTC

(In reply to Kevin Fenzi from comment #3)
> Well, 2 of those are only available are arm/aarch64, so there's nothing we
> can do in comps about that I don't think. 

There is "arch" or "basearch" xml attribute exists. I really want to make comps reliable, not simply skip **mandatory** packages.

Comment 5 Kevin Fenzi 2018-03-04 17:54:58 UTC

Does dnf work with those? If so, yeah, we can add those to those arm specific packages and solve this.