Bug 1539406
| Summary: | the readiness timeout for rhgs-server-container should take into account higher number of bricks | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Raghavendra Talur <rtalur> |
| Component: | cns-deploy-tool | Assignee: | Raghavendra Talur <rtalur> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | krishnaram Karthick <kramdoss> |
| Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | cns-3.6 | CC: | bmohanra, hchiramm, jarrpa, kramdoss, rcyriac, rgeorge, rhs-bugs, vinug |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | CNS 3.6 Async | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | cns-deploy-5.0.0-59.el7rhgs | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
| Doc Text: |
Earlier, in environments with many logical volumes, the rhgs-server-container image did not start within the "failureThreshold" and "periodSeconds" value as configured in the templates. With this fix, the "failureThreshold" value is increased from 15 to 50 in the templates to resolve the issue.
|
Story Points: | --- |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-01-30 08:36:36 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Raghavendra Talur
2018-01-28 17:21:19 UTC
The new build with rhgs-server-rhel7:3.3.1-3 has the following timeout values:
readinessProbe:
timeoutSeconds: 3
initialDelaySeconds: 40
exec:
command:
- "/bin/bash"
- "-c"
- systemctl status glusterd.service
periodSeconds: 25
successThreshold: 1
failureThreshold: 50
livenessProbe:
timeoutSeconds: 3
initialDelaySeconds: 40
exec:
command:
- "/bin/bash"
- "-c"
- systemctl status glusterd.service
periodSeconds: 25
successThreshold: 1
failureThreshold: 50
Hence moving the bug to verified
Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:0234 |