Bug 1541052
| Summary: | ghostscript: Build flags injection is not fully effective | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Florian Weimer <fweimer> |
| Component: | ghostscript | Assignee: | David Kaspar // Dee'Kej <deekej> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | high | ||
| Version: | 28 | CC: | deekej, twaugh, zdohnal |
| Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Reopened |
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | All | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | ghostscript-9.23-1.fc28 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-04-04 15:50:40 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1539083 | ||
|
Description
Florian Weimer
2018-02-01 15:31:02 UTC
Thanks for the report, Florian! :) Anyway, this is really strange. The LDFLAGS injection shouldn't be different package we have built for F27. I will need to investigate further on what's going on there... It's not a regression, I see ET_EXEC with ghostscript-core-9.22-3.fc27.x86_64 as well. (Only rawhide has the tools for detecting various kinds of build flag injection failures.) (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #2) > It's not a regression, I see ET_EXEC with > ghostscript-core-9.22-3.fc27.x86_64 as well. (Only rawhide has the tools > for detecting various kinds of build flag injection failures.) Ah, OK, thanks for letting me know then. :) It's still failing to inject the correct flags even with hardened build enabled: %global _hardened_build 1 I guess I will have to try to manually inject the flags for %configure via LDFLAGS environment variable. If this fails, I'll report it to upstream to check with them what's going on there... And looking at the build logs, the -fPIC parameter is passed there as it should... :-| https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/ghostscript/9.22/7.fc28/data/logs/x86_64/build.log This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 28 development cycle. Changing version to '28'. any news here? Actually yes - the fix I have proposed to upstream has been accepted & was released in version 9.23. Would you please put the fix into Fedora 28 as well? It has only ghostscript-9.22-9.fc28, which is still affected by this bug. (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #7) > Would you please put the fix into Fedora 28 as well? It has only > ghostscript-9.22-9.fc28, which is still affected by this bug. Oh, I have missed that we have passed the point where Bodhi was enabled for F28. ghostscript-9.23-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9983eb2f9e ghostscript-9.23-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-9983eb2f9e ghostscript-9.23-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |