Bug 154392
| Summary: | HelixPlayer should be removed | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Need Real Name <lsof> |
| Component: | distribution | Assignee: | John (J5) Palmieri <johnp> |
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | djh, fedora-package-review, fitzsim, hdegoede, jeff, jkeck, marius.andreiana, tchung, tmraz, vedran, wtogami |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-07-28 02:20:45 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 150223 | ||
|
Description
Need Real Name
2005-04-11 13:37:02 UTC
Will HelixPlayer be removed before the freeze in a week? No. Helix and Totem will be both installed by default. Ok. How come? >>>> There seemed to be no objections to the package's removal.
>>> Will HelixPlayer be removed before the freeze in a week?
>> No. Helix and Totem will be both installed by default.
> Ok. Home come?
Hello?
Sorry, I was busy with other issues to respond to this. Really it is not something that should be discussed in bugzilla and is just creates noise when I have tones of crasher bugs to fix. Bugs such as, abc format is opening up in Helix which doesn't know what to do with them, is a bit more productive. To answer your question the reason we have not removed Helix or Totem is that there has been no decision on which one really should be the default so we include both for right now. Will there be a decision? Yes. When will that be? I don't know. Hopefully before FC5. I know this is against the norm for what Fedora is trying to produce but it is a politicly charged decision that should not be made in haste nor in the current political climate. (In reply to comment #5) > Sorry, I was busy with other issues to respond to this. Really it is not > something that should be discussed in bugzilla and is just creates noise when I > have tones of crasher bugs to fix. Bugs such as, abc format is opening up in > Helix which doesn't know what to do with them, is a bit more productive. > > To answer your question the reason we have not removed Helix or Totem is that > there has been no decision on which one really should be the default so we > include both for right now. Will there be a decision? Yes. When will that be? > I don't know. Hopefully before FC5. I know this is against the norm for what > Fedora is trying to produce but it is a politicly charged decision that should > not be made in haste nor in the current political climate. Oh good. Now we have an open review process, we can see the reasons :) Unsure if this is a proper use of the review process, but I happen to want this to be removed too. Let's see if it is possible now. Erm, Why is this blocking FE-NEW ? There was a change lost in the bugzilla crash; let me see if I can find it. Yes, on Jun 12 Warren changed the status of this bug. I'll duplicate his change now. Removed in rawhide |