Bug 154829
Summary: | dhcp doesn't work during install | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Zoltan Kota <zoltank> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | David Cantrell <dcantrell> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Mike McLean <mikem> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4 | CC: | barryn, herrold, sundaram, tejasdinkar |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | powerpc | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2006-08-24 20:39:41 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Zoltan Kota
2005-04-14 14:14:25 UTC
What messages are there on tty3 and tty4 after attempting to get the dhcp lease? tty3: waiting for link... 0 seconds. running dhcp for eth0 pump told us: No DHCP reply received tty4: eth0: Link is up at 100Mbps, full duplex. eth0: Pause is disabled Nov 30 00:04:39 loader: CLASSID: sending anaconda Nov 30 00:04:39 loader: PUMP: sending discover Nov 30 00:04:39 loader: breq: opcode: 1<135>Nov 30 00:04:39 loader: ... ... loader: breq: vendor: 0xff Does DHCP work after install? The messages don't really show anything wrong to speak of :/ Yes, DHCP works after install. This one looks like a dupe of https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121817 Jeremy. can you confirm this? Did this work in FC4 final? No. With boot.iso from FC4 final, it's the same. FWIW, on an iMac G3, FC4 final works for me but FC5 test2 seems to hit this bug, as does rawhide from a couple days ago (from around Jan. 31st). Actually, in my case on FC5 test2 or rawhide, my tty4 output is the same as the original reporter, but my tty3 output is: going to do getNetConfig eth0 isn't a wireless adaptor running dhcp for eth0 I never get a "pump told us: No DHCP reply received" line... Should I file another bug instead of adding to this one? Yes, maybe you should file a new bug report against fc5test2 then. Please try again with FC6 or FC6 test 2. Lots of work has gone into DHCP for this release. I have tried boot.iso from FC6 test2. Maybe the situation is a bit better but finally it doesn't work. The messages on the console: tty3: going to pick interface only have one network device: eth0 going to do getNetConfig eth0 is not a wireless adapter nic_update_link failed - 105: recumsg failed (errno = No buffer space available) dhcp_nic: ifup (eth0) failed Listening on LPF/eth0:00:11:24:30:5b:3c Sending on LPF/eth0:00:11:24:30:5b:3c Sending on Socket/fallback DHCPDISCOVER on eth0 to 255.255.255.255 port 67 interval 4 DHCPOFFER from 192.168.24.1 bound to 192.168.24.58 -- reneval in 41450 seconds. DHCP v4 eth0 - obtained lease 192.168.24.58 DHCPv4 eth0 option subnet - mask: 255.255.255.0 DHCPv4 eth0 option subnet - mask - prefix_len: 24 broadcast: 192.168.24.255 DHCPv4 eth0 - option routers: nic_addr_send failed - 105: recumsg failed (errno No buffer space available) nic _ configure: failed to add address. result of pumpSetupInterface is DHCP Configuration failed - 1 Operation not permitted. ppc and ppc64 systems were failing to get DHCP leases in loader in FC6 test 2. Problem was fixed in libdhcp and the change is now available in rawhide. |