Bug 1548671
Summary: | rockboxUtility does not compile on ppc64le | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | philippe ventrillon <pventrillon> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Nobody's working on this, feel free to take it <nobody> |
Status: | CLOSED NOTABUG | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | dan, package-review, ppisar, rc040203, zebob.m |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | ppc64le | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | NotReady | ||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-08-10 00:57:43 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 201449, 1071880 |
Description
philippe ventrillon
2018-02-24 10:38:28 UTC
Yup, looks as a wrong assumption (if ppc, then mac) by the buildsystem, it should be reported upstream. Yes i am going to report the bug upstream My first goal was to have a bug to be able to place an excludeArch tag in my .spec file while still being conformant to package guidelines. If you have a closer look into the build.log, you'll notice that this package does not honor Fedora's CFLAGS at all. Just a few info : - Not needed: Group:, Packager: - Use the %{qmake_qt5} macro - Use correct format for %changelog (that's where you put your name) Why is this filed as a package review? Thank you for your help and acomments. I have tried to set a %{ qmake_qt4 } macro instead of invoking qt-make directly. Unfortunately it makes the program to not compile anymore. I get lots of errors like : /usr/bin/ld: /home/ventrill/projects/rpm/rbutil5/RockboxUtility-v1.4.0/buildrbutil/build//libs//librbspeex.a(rbspeex.o): relocation R_X86_64_32 against `.rodata.str1.1' can not be used when making a shared object; recompile with -fPIC I think i will need time and help from upstream to investigate this. I opened this bug to have a number to place in the spec file nearby the excludeArch tag. When i opened the bug package review seemed to me the most suitable. This is an automatic check from review-stats script. This review request ticket hasn't been updated for some time. We're sorry it is taking so long. If you're still interested in packaging this software into Fedora repositories, please respond to this comment clearing the NEEDINFO flag. You may want to update the specfile and the src.rpm to the latest version available and to propose a review swap on Fedora devel mailing list to increase chances to have your package reviewed. If this is your first package and you need a sponsor, you may want to post some informal reviews. Read more at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group. Without any reply, this request will shortly be considered abandoned and will be closed. Thank you for your patience. This is an automatic action taken by review-stats script. The ticket submitter failed to clear the NEEDINFO flag in a month. As per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_stalled_package_reviews we consider this ticket as DEADREVIEW and proceed to close it. |