Bug 1548676
Summary: | openldap: Does not use Fedora build flags | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Florian Weimer <fweimer> | ||||
Component: | openldap | Assignee: | Matus Honek <mhonek> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED NEXTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> | ||||
Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | fweimer, mhonek, rmeggins | ||||
Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | openldap-2.4.45-13.fc28 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2018-03-01 15:22:01 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Bug Depends On: | |||||||
Bug Blocks: | 1539083 | ||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Florian Weimer
2018-02-24 11:01:09 UTC
Created attachment 1400831 [details] consolidate build flags Thanks for looking into this. I'm attaching a patch that should resolve the issue. However, before applying it I'd like to have the possible issue described in the following paragraph resolved. However, I'm a bit concerned about the -fPIE vs. -fpie on s390/s390x vs. others. I'm not sure if this is somehow taken into account with the redhat-rpm-config. I'd like to avoid reintroducing bug 1020661. I cannot see from the build.log if the flag was actually pulled in as it is included with -specs. Anyway, I'd like to prevent a possible regression in the future. Could you please provide some guidance here? Thanks. (In reply to Matus Honek from comment #1) > However, I'm a bit concerned about the -fPIE vs. -fpie on s390/s390x vs. > others. I'm not sure if this is somehow taken into account with the > redhat-rpm-config. I'd like to avoid reintroducing bug 1020661. I cannot see > from the build.log if the flag was actually pulled in as it is included with > -specs. Anyway, I'd like to prevent a possible regression in the future. > Could you please provide some guidance here? The GCC specs fragment will use -fPIC or -fPIE, to be conservative. It will not override -fpic or -fpie specified on the command line, but if there is nothing there, it will use the version that supports larger shared objects. (In reply to Matus Honek from comment #1) > Created attachment 1400831 [details] > consolidate build flags I don't like the explicit list of flags there: +export CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} -Wl,--as-needed,-z,relro,-z,now -DLDAP_CONNECTIONLESS" It should be something like this, to inherit all future changes in redhat-rpm-config: +export CFLAGS="${CFLAGS} ${LDFLAGS} -Wl,--as-needed -DLDAP_CONNECTIONLESS" Applying as Florian proposed. The effective flags in the build.log look fine. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openldap/c/cd7bdcf821f7ae4c1d97189129cdbbfdfe9d5210?branch=f28 Also dropping an old unnecessary patch: https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/openldap/c/6f8a4c6436709dd6c43c64e8006bc26946cab63f?branch=f28 |