Bug 1548824
| Summary: | scipy: Some Python extension modules are linked without BIND_NOW | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Florian Weimer <fweimer> |
| Component: | scipy | Assignee: | Thomas Spura <tomspur> |
| Status: | CLOSED EOL | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | unspecified | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 29 | CC: | cstratak, igor.raits, mhroncok, tomspur |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-11-27 19:02:43 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
| Bug Depends On: | |||
| Bug Blocks: | 1539083 | ||
|
Description
Florian Weimer
2018-02-25 10:22:20 UTC
I'm updating scipy to 1.1.0. How do I recheck this? (In reply to Miro Hrončok from comment #1) > I'm updating scipy to 1.1.0. How do I recheck this? You could run checksec on individual files, or annocheck (from annobin) on the whole RPM. annocheck is still under heavy development, but its report about BIND_NOW will be accurate at least. Note that I've tried to add LDFLAGS="$RPM_LD_FLAGS" to the build but it failed with ld error (undefined reference to main). https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=27792463 ------ (In reply to Florian Weimer from comment #2) > You could run checksec on individual files, or annocheck (from annobin) on > the whole RPM. annocheck is still under heavy development, but its report > about BIND_NOW will be accurate at least. Sorry for dump questions, but you have an exact command and rpm I need? Nothing provides /usr/bin/checkspec or /usr/bin/annocheck on F28. any news here? This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 29 development cycle. Changing version to '29'. This message is a reminder that Fedora 29 is nearing its end of life. Fedora will stop maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 29 on 2019-11-26. It is Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no longer maintained. At that time this bug will be closed as EOL if it remains open with a Fedora 'version' of '29'. Package Maintainer: If you wish for this bug to remain open because you plan to fix it in a currently maintained version, simply change the 'version' to a later Fedora version. Thank you for reporting this issue and we are sorry that we were not able to fix it before Fedora 29 is end of life. If you would still like to see this bug fixed and are able to reproduce it against a later version of Fedora, you are encouraged change the 'version' to a later Fedora version prior this bug is closed as described in the policy above. Although we aim to fix as many bugs as possible during every release's lifetime, sometimes those efforts are overtaken by events. Often a more recent Fedora release includes newer upstream software that fixes bugs or makes them obsolete. Fedora 29 changed to end-of-life (EOL) status on 2019-11-26. Fedora 29 is no longer maintained, which means that it will not receive any further security or bug fix updates. As a result we are closing this bug. If you can reproduce this bug against a currently maintained version of Fedora please feel free to reopen this bug against that version. If you are unable to reopen this bug, please file a new report against the current release. If you experience problems, please add a comment to this bug. Thank you for reporting this bug and we are sorry it could not be fixed. On FC29 there is at least not an error about BIND_NOW, so assuming this is not an issue in recent versions anymore. Instead there are these failings with annocheck (duplicates were skipped in the output): $ annocheck /usr/lib64/python3.7/site-packages/scipy/fftpack/_fftpack.cpython-37m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so Hardened: _fftpack.cpython-37m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so: fail: (addr range: 0xda40..0xdd75): Insufficient value for -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE: 0. Hardened: _fftpack.cpython-37m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so: fail: (addr range: 0xda40..0xdd75): Compiled without -D_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS. Hardened: _fftpack.cpython-37m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so: FAIL: Parts of the binary were compiled without -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=2. Hardened: _fftpack.cpython-37m-x86_64-linux-gnu.so: FAIL: Parts of the binary were compiled without -D_GLIBCXX_ASSRTIONS. |