Bug 1549844
Summary: | Hibernate no longer works when Secure Boot is enabled | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Edvard <edvard.holst> |
Component: | systemd | Assignee: | systemd-maint |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | urgent | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 27 | CC: | andrej, lnykryn, msekleta, redhat-bugzilla, ssahani, s, systemd-maint, zbyszek |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-04-10 11:38:31 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Edvard
2018-02-27 21:21:11 UTC
I have exactly the same issue on Fedora 27 and 28, with ~all kernels I tried, e.g. kernel-4.16.0-0.rc7.git0.1.fc28.x86_64 kernel-4.16.0-300.fc28.x86_64 The hardware is a Dell Inspiron 7548/0AM6R0. Secure Boot is enabled. My disk layout: # lsblk -o NAME,FSTYPE,LABEL,MOUNTPOINT NAME FSTYPE LABEL MOUNTPOINT sda ├─sda1 vfat /boot/efi └─sda2 LVM2_member ├─cryptprdell-luks crypto_LUKS │ └─plainprdell LVM2_member │ ├─plainprdell-swap swap [SWAP] │ └─plainprdell-root btrfs prdell /home └─cryptprdell-boot btrfs boot /boot The swap partition is mounted: # swapon NAME TYPE SIZE USED PRIO /dev/dm-2 partition 16G 0B -2 Hibernation doesn't show up as an option in SDDM and/or in Plasma. I'm getting the same message from systemctl hibernate ("Failed to hibernate system via logind: Sleep verb not supported"). Hibernation used to work fine sometimes around Fedora 25/26, but silently disappeared at some point. Update: Disabling Secure Boot in the setup indeed enables hibernation and it works perfectly fine. But it would be nice to have *both* hibernation and Secure Boot. This is the same as #1467045 which is older and has more information. I'll just copy the title from this one. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1467045 *** |