Bug 1550491
| Summary: | Stacktrace (KeyError) for `dnf updateinfo list security` | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Stefan Schwarzer <redhat-bugzilla> |
| Component: | dnf | Assignee: | rpm-software-management |
| Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | unspecified | ||
| Version: | 27 | CC: | dmach, mblaha, mhatina, packaging-team-maint, rpm-software-management, vmukhame |
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2018-03-07 10:24:45 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1545075 *** |
Description of problem: When running `dnf updateinfo` and if security updates are available, running `dnf updateinfo list security`, I get a stacktrace. # dnf updateinfo Last metadata expiration check: 0:35:51 ago on 2018-03-01T08:24:02 CET. Updates Information Summary: available 3 Security notice(s) 1 Bugfix notice(s) 6 Enhancement notice(s) and immediately following: # dnf updateinfo list security Last metadata expiration check: 0:37:26 ago on 2018-03-01T08:24:02 CET. Traceback (most recent call last): File "/usr/bin/dnf", line 58, in <module> main.user_main(sys.argv[1:], exit_code=True) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 179, in user_main errcode = main(args) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 64, in main return _main(base, args, cli_class, option_parser_class) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 99, in _main return cli_run(cli, base) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dnf/cli/main.py", line 115, in cli_run cli.run() File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dnf/cli/cli.py", line 1014, in run return self.command.run() File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dnf/cli/commands/updateinfo.py", line 417, in run display(apkg_adv_insts, mixed, description) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dnf/cli/commands/updateinfo.py", line 292, in display_list for (nevra, inst), id2type in cls._list(apkg_adv_insts)) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dnf/cli/commands/updateinfo.py", line 292, in <genexpr> for (nevra, inst), id2type in cls._list(apkg_adv_insts)) File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dnf/cli/commands/updateinfo.py", line 290, in <genexpr> for id_, (typ, sev) in id2type.items()), File "/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/dnf/cli/commands/updateinfo.py", line 283, in type2label return (cls.SECURITY2LABEL[sev] if typ == hawkey.ADVISORY_SECURITY KeyError: 'None' Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): # cat /etc/fedora-release Fedora release 26 (Twenty Six) # dnf --version 2.7.5 Installed: dnf-0:2.7.5-2.fc26.noarch at 2017-12-12T22:20:45 GMT Built : Fedora Project at 2017-11-29T09:55:03 GMT Installed: rpm-0:4.13.0.2-1.fc26.x86_64 at 2017-11-11T19:13:11 GMT Built : Fedora Project at 2017-10-26T08:32:51 GMT dnf 2.7.5 seems to be the default version in Fedora 26. How reproducible: On every run - if security updates are available. I don't know if this happens if updates are available, but no security updates. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Run `dnf updateinfo` 2. If security updates are available, run `dnf updateinfo list security` Actual results: See stacktrace above. Expected results: `dnf updateinfo list security` should list information about security updates. Additional info: I also tried running `dnf clean all` before repeating `dnf updateinfo list security`, but this didn't change anything. I tried different alternative command line invocations that I found on the web, but I get the same stacktrace for each of the possibilities. A search in the Red Hat bugtracker didn't give me any results on the problem. I had to select a component and a subcomponent to submit the bug. I don't know if the selections make sense in the context of this bug.