Bug 15511

Summary:	Upgrade from 6.2 fails Test Case U-I-03
Product:	[Retired] Red Hat Linux	Reporter:	David Lawrence <dkl>
Component:	anaconda	Assignee:	Brock Organ <borgan>
Status:	CLOSED DUPLICATE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	7.0
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	i386
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:	Winston gold
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2000-08-18 21:06:40 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Derek Tattersall 2000-08-05 19:24:02 UTC

Upgrade with raid partition. Added additional packages during upgrade. 
After rebooting
got message from rpm -qa egcs-compat-libs - no verson info.  The additional
packages were not added.

Comment 1 Glen Foster 2000-08-07 17:24:58 UTC

This defect is considered MUST-FIX for Winston Gold-release

Comment 2 Michael Fulbright 2000-08-11 19:56:25 UTC

Matt will you please look into this - seems related to update/RPM issues we have
seen in other bugs.

Comment 3 Matt Wilson 2000-08-14 19:07:20 UTC

*** Bug 15802 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 4 Michael Fulbright 2000-08-15 22:31:43 UTC

I think this should work fine now - Brock could you coordinate with dlt to
resolve this issue?

Comment 5 Brent Fox 2000-08-16 14:55:54 UTC

I tried this yesterday with a relatively small (not quite minimal) install of
6.2 and then upgraded to the latest tree while adding additional packages, but
it hung at the very end of the install.  I had a software RAID 0 partition.

Comment 6 Derek Tattersall 2000-08-16 17:45:36 UTC

Using the qa0816.0 tree the missing packages do not occur.  However, after the
update I did an rpm -qa | grep zsh to see if the package I added was truly
added, and I got the following message from rpm.
/usr/lib/rpm/rpmq: /usr/i486-linux-libc5/lib/libdb.so.2:  no version information
available (required by /usr/lib/librpm.so.0)

Comment 7 borgia 2000-08-18 05:58:03 UTC

6.2->RC1: db1 still not installed.

Comment 8 Bill Nottingham 2000-08-18 21:06:37 UTC


*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 16386 ***