Bug 155164

Summary: ipv6calc spec file cleanup and macrofying
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla>
Component: ipv6calcAssignee: Radek Vokál <rvokal>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: pb
Target Milestone: ---Keywords: EasyFix
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-04-19 08:56:21 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Attachments:
Description Flags
Diff of ipv6calc spec files none

Description Robert Scheck 2005-04-17 12:35:05 UTC
Description of problem:
ipv6calc spec file should get some cleanups and better rpm macrofying 
including the use of %check, %docdir for example. Directories also should
be owned correctly by the package.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
ipv6calc-0.48-4

Actual results / Expected results:
Apply of the patch or even better ;-)

Comment 1 Robert Scheck 2005-04-17 12:36:38 UTC
Created attachment 113287 [details]
Diff of ipv6calc spec files

Comment 2 Radek Vokál 2005-04-19 08:56:21 UTC
Checked in, thanks

Comment 3 Robert Scheck 2005-04-19 09:04:49 UTC
Btw, http://cvs.fedora.redhat.com/viewcvs/devel/ipv6calc/ doesn't exist. Why? Is 
it possible to change it?! :)

Comment 4 Radek Vokál 2006-06-26 10:35:00 UTC
I'm sorry but the link is valid .. What are you pointing at?

Comment 5 Robert Scheck 2006-06-26 10:40:23 UTC
Ehm? When I wrote comment #3 more than a year ago, in fact, it wasn't valid.
But why are we using an old and successfully closed bug report?

Comment 6 Peter Bieringer 2006-06-26 10:43:36 UTC
I cc'ed me to check, whether spec file enhancements should be (or were already)
done also in vanilla source (where I also distribute a spec file) - no rumours ;-)

Comment 7 Radek Vokál 2006-06-26 11:09:35 UTC
Ah, my fault :) I've just received notification from bugzilla a read the very
last comment ...