Bug 155429
| Summary: | Both chinese in anaconda does not have correct fonts | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Leon Ho <llch> | ||||
| Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list> | ||||
| Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Mike McLean <mikem> | ||||
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||
| Priority: | medium | ||||||
| Version: | rawhide | CC: | eng-i18n-bugs, tagoh | ||||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||||||
| Target Release: | --- | ||||||
| Hardware: | All | ||||||
| OS: | Linux | ||||||
| Whiteboard: | |||||||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |||||
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
| Last Closed: | 2005-04-29 01:16:37 UTC | Type: | --- | ||||
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
| Embargoed: | |||||||
| Attachments: |
|
||||||
|
Description
Leon Ho
2005-04-20 09:09:51 UTC
Created attachment 113398 [details]
screenshot
OK, so either the translations are wrong, as these look like what's in the po file, or the actual font is wrong. I have no idea what to do about either of those, but I suspect you do. Thoughts? I'm guessing the font is missing. Look in /usr/share/fonts (in stage2.img) and see if the chinese fonts are there. It's entirely possible with the fun of fonts moving around, we missed one. For your question in IRC on fonts - The heavier one is japanese fonts - Kochi Mincho. The lighter one should be the correct one - AR PL SungtiL GB. You see the help title (four characters) - First, Second, Forth look like they are using japanese fonts, and third one is using simplified chinese glyph. It seems like a effect of having Japanese preferred first. There was the same problem in FC2. FC3 has fixed it, but it comes out in FC4T2 again. It looks like rawhide has traditional working fine, but not simplified. We have both gbsn00lp.ttf and bsmi00lp.ttf in the stage2.img. Which _should_ be right unless we need AR PL Kaitim GB for some reason for those characters. Kochi Mincho is listed first in /etc/fonts/fonts.conf, but the right thing should happen with LANG set. I'd rather not add the other font -- is it actually needed or is there something else going on? Something else is going on... AR PL SungtiL GB should be enough for those chars in simplified chinese. Is the LANG set to zh_CN.UTF-8? Tagoh-san, any insight? (this problem maybe hidden for a while as we have just removed bitmap and move back to ttf on this devel cycle) BTW which LANG is anaconda running on? it's probably because fontconfig chooses the Japanese font first so that the proper LANG isn't set and basically some kanji characters are duplicated between Chinese font and Japanese font. fontconfig won't work without the proper LANG in all CJK AFAICS. otherwise it just works for one or two. LANG is set to zh_CN.UTF-8 by the loader. Just thought I'd throw in that there may be further problems here regarding Chinese. We've noticed that the button bar is never being translated and gtk complains about the locale not being supported by the C library, despite the above LANG setting. Perhaps these two issues are related. Oh, this problem is surely because of that. the proper fonts won't be chosen so that gtk+ doesn't recognize the locale. no zh_CN.UTF-8 locale are available somehow? just wonder. Yeah, I was just going to say that there's probably a relationship there. I'm going to be poking into that more later today hopefully... any insight would help This looks better to me in /mnt/redhat/devel/katzj/i386 (which should be in rawhide-20050429) |