Bug 1554291

Summary: When storage reserve limit is reached, appending data to an existing file throws EROFS error
Product: [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage Reporter: Prasad Desala <tdesala>
Component: replicateAssignee: Ravishankar N <ravishankar>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Prasad Desala <tdesala>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: rhgs-3.4CC: ksubrahm, moagrawa, rhs-bugs, storage-qa-internal
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: RHGS 3.4.0   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: glusterfs-3.12.2-8 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of:
: 1561129 (view as bug list) Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-09-04 06:44:14 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1503137, 1561129, 1597154    

Description Prasad Desala 2018-03-12 10:52:08 UTC
Description of problem:
=======================
When storage reserve limit is reached, appending data to an existing file throws EROFS error.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
3.12.2-5.el7rhgs.x86_64

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
===================
1) create a x3 volume and start it.
2) Set storage.reserve volume set option to 90,
gluster volume set distrepx3 storage.reserve 90
3) Create data using dd until the backend bricks reaches reserve limit.
4) Now, try appending data to the existing file.

Actual results:
===============
appending data to an existing file throws EROFS error
cat /etc/redhat-release  > 25MB_997
-bash: 25MB_997: Read-only file system

Expected results:
=================
It should throw appropriate error, ENOSPC.

Comment 12 Prasad Desala 2018-04-27 13:56:42 UTC
Verified this BZ on glusterfs version 3.12.2-8.el7rhgs.x86_64.

Now, when storage reserve limit is reached, appending data to an existing file is throwing ENOSPC error as expected.

Moving this BZ to Verified.

Comment 14 errata-xmlrpc 2018-09-04 06:44:14 UTC
Since the problem described in this bug report should be
resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a
resolution of ERRATA.

For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated
files, follow the link below.

If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report.

https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2018:2607