Bug 1558475

Summary: dropdown fields marked as required are not letting a custom dialog validate after values have been selected
Product: Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine Reporter: Felix Dewaleyne <fdewaley>
Component: UI - OPSAssignee: Chris Hale <chhale>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Shveta <sshveta>
Severity: high Docs Contact:
Priority: high    
Version: 5.9.0CC: bascar, cpelland, dajohnso, fdewaley, hkataria, jprause, lavenel, mpovolny, obarenbo, sshveta
Target Milestone: GAFlags: fdewaley: needinfo-
Target Release: 5.9.2   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-04-13 14:07:44 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: CFME Core Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 1554897    

Description Felix Dewaleyne 2018-03-20 09:56:16 UTC 
Description of problem:
dropdown fields marked as required are not letting a custom dialog validate even with values selected

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.9.0.22

How reproducible:
all the time

Steps to Reproduce:
1. create a simple dialog with no automation and a couple drpobox fields allowing only one value to be selected
2. try to use the dialog, selecting every value then going back to the first value and making another selection

Actual results:
the dialog does not validate

Expected results:
the dialog validates as expected

Additional info:
attaching privately information regarding this dialog from the customer case
Comment 4 Felix Dewaleyne 2018-03-20 15:34:51 UTC 
using "required" on a dropbox will make the form impossible to validate no matter what.
Comment 6 Chris Hale 2018-03-21 23:16:42 UTC 
Could you retest this on a Updated gaprindashvili appliance and validate whether it works for you?
Comment 7 Felix Dewaleyne 2018-03-23 16:37:05 UTC 
(In reply to Chris Hale from comment #6)
> Could you retest this on a Updated gaprindashvili appliance and validate
> whether it works for you?

I don't have one ready, if you can share one I can do the test.
Comment 9 Shveta 2018-03-23 18:44:56 UTC 
Not able to recreate on 5.9.2.0.20180320210136_355c506 and 5.9.1.1.20180321221247_67fd99d
Comment 11 Dave Johnson 2018-03-27 13:52:06 UTC 
See comment 8, can you please retest.
Comment 12 Dave Johnson 2018-03-27 13:52:42 UTC 
Felix, please see comment 10
Comment 13 Felix Dewaleyne 2018-03-29 09:17:17 UTC 
I do not have a 5.9.1 appliance ready for testing and as things stand will not be able to test until the errata is actually released.