Bug 156004

Summary:	Oo.org update fails because of missing dependencies
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3	Reporter:	Ralph Smith <smith>
Component:	openoffice.org	Assignee:	Dennis Gregorovic <dgregor>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	3.0	CC:	benl, jturner, shillman, vgaikwad, whamblen
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	1.1.2-24.2.1.EL3	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-07-15 18:41:32 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Ralph Smith 2005-04-26 16:01:34 UTC

Description of problem:
Update of openoffice.org-libs fails because it depends on 32-bit versions of
gnome-vfs and bonobo-activation which do not appear to be included in the x86_64
version of RHEL3.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
openoffice.org-libs 1.1.2-24.2.0.EL3 for an x86_64

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:
1. run up2date on a system with old OpenOffice.org
2.
3.
  
Actual results:


Expected results:


Additional info:

Comment 4 Jay Turner 2005-04-27 06:35:44 UTC

Just closing the loop here, need the following two packages:

libbonobo-2.2.3-1.i386
gnome-vfs2-2.2.5-2E.1.i386

pushed to the RHEL3 x86_64-AS, ES, WS, Desktop channels.

Comment 5 Caolan McNamara 2005-04-27 07:11:05 UTC

so to whom should this be assigned

Comment 7 Dennis Gregorovic 2005-04-27 17:00:07 UTC

libbonobo-2.2.3-1.i386
gnome-vfs2-2.2.5-2E.1.i386

now pushed to the RHEL3 x86_64-AS, ES, WS, Desktop channels.

Comment 9 Ralph Smith 2005-04-27 18:04:31 UTC

(In reply to comment #7)
> libbonobo-2.2.3-1.i386
> gnome-vfs2-2.2.5-2E.1.i386
> 
> now pushed to the RHEL3 x86_64-AS, ES, WS, Desktop channels.

Still need the bonobo-activation RPM as well, probably
bonobo-activation-2.2.2-1.i386

Comment 16 Ralph Smith 2005-04-28 13:53:45 UTC

That did it; thanks, folks.

I did have to manually force the install of bonobo-activation-2.2.2-1.i386,
however, since it contains a doc file which duplicates one in the x86_64 RPM.
(rpm -i --replacefiles --nodeps bonobo-activation...)

Comment 19 Dennis Gregorovic 2005-05-06 18:33:27 UTC

*** Bug 157051 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

Comment 24 Dennis Gregorovic 2005-05-26 19:11:36 UTC

I believe that this bug has been resolved.  Any objections to closing it?

Comment 26 Caolan McNamara 2005-07-15 15:12:43 UTC

should this be closed then ?

Comment 27 Ben Levenson 2005-07-15 18:41:32 UTC

Yes.