Bug 156209

Summary: FC4 rebuild failed
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Michael Schwendt <bugs.michael>
Component: fwbuilderAssignee: Steve Grubb <sgrubb>
Status: CLOSED RAWHIDE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhide   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-05-23 17:10:57 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 157183    

Description Michael Schwendt 2005-04-28 13:04:47 UTC
This package failed to rebuild for FC4 Development around 2005-04-11 after an
automated release bump.

Architectures: i386 ppc

Build failure logs at: http://fedoraproject.org/extras/development/build-logs/

Comment 1 Steve Grubb 2005-04-28 20:59:07 UTC
This appears to be a tool failure. I can't imagine fwbedit needing to link
against librpm. Neither of the other archs link against librpm. Don't know what
to say about this.

Comment 2 Michael Schwendt 2005-05-17 22:07:03 UTC
* Rebuild of libfwbuilder and fwbuilder in the new build system should do [or be
tried at least].

E.g. libfwbuilder is linked against libelf.so.1 from elfutils-libelf, although
it is no build requirement. The unclean build environment of Fedora pre-Extras
could be the cause of qmake adding more/wrong libraries.  libfwbuilder is also
linked against libnetsnmp.so.5, although net-snmp-devel is commented out in the
spec file.

* fwbuilder/libfwbuilder release 2.0.7 is available.

* A few sub-directories are not included in fwbuilder package. Fix is this:


Comment 3 Michael Schwendt 2005-05-23 17:10:57 UTC
As guessed in comment 2, katzj's all-arch rebuild of libfwbuilder and fwbuilder
succeeded this time.