Bug 1564495
| Summary: | Quota - Azure requested storage value differs from flavor image and from provisioned VM storage. | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine | Reporter: | Anurag <ansinha> |
| Component: | Providers | Assignee: | Daniel Berger <dberger> |
| Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Anurag <ansinha> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 5.9.0 | CC: | akarol, ansinha, cpelland, gblomqui, hkataria, jfrey, jhardy, lavenel, mkanoor, mpovolny, obarenbo, simaishi, tfitzger, wfitzger |
| Target Milestone: | GA | ||
| Target Release: | 5.10.0 | ||
| Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
| OS: | Unspecified | ||
| Whiteboard: | :tenant | ||
| Fixed In Version: | 5.10.0.0 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2019-02-07 23:01:30 UTC | Type: | Bug |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | Bug | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | CFME Core | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
Hi Anurag, I am trying to determine how to get the correct storage value from an Azure instance. Can you try the same test with another Cloud provider? I am trying to determine if this is just Azure or other cloud provider have a similar problem. Thanks Billy Hi Billy, I tested other cloud provider with similar issue but this issue is only reproducible with Azure provider. Thanks, -Anurag Anurag, Can we change the title of this BZ to reflect the real issue? The issue is that Azure requested storage is incorrectly calculated. Thanks Billy Hi Billy, Sure change the name but make sure that you highlight the correct scenario where this issue is observed. Thanks, -Anurag All of the root_disk_size values are the same for all Azure flavors. We use this value for quota. Assigning to Porviders. Looks like we were calculating the disk size incorrectly. https://github.com/ManageIQ/manageiq-providers-azure/pull/264 Hi Team, I have verified this on version: Version 5.10.0.1.20180619163011_900fdc4, and it's working fine and this issue is resolved. Thanks for fixing this issue. Hence I am changing the status from on_qa to verified. Thanks, -Anurag Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2019:0212 |
Hi Anurag, I checked out the automation.log for request 40 on the your appliance and it looks like quota is working properly for the tag storage value: [----] I, [2018-04-06T06:34:57.256578 #13173:a7510c] INFO -- : Followed Relationship [miqaedb:/System/Policy/MiqProvisionRequest_Approved#create] [----] I, [2018-04-06T06:34:57.257010 #13173:a7510c] INFO -- : Followed Relationship [miqaedb:/System/Policy/request_approved#create] [----] I, [2018-04-06T06:34:57.257479 #13173:a7510c] INFO -- : Followed Relationship [miqaedb:/System/Event/RequestEvent/Request/request_approved#create] [----] I, [2018-04-06T06:34:57.536995 #18222:6d6b784] INFO -- : <AEMethod validate_quota> Request: Provision from [centos-tmpl] to [test_ansinha] id: 40 [----] I, [2018-04-06T06:34:57.538748 #18222:6d6b784] INFO -- : <AEMethod validate_quota> quota_warning: {:storage=>10737418240000, :vms=>10, :cpu=>20000, :memory=>107374182400000} [----] I, [2018-04-06T06:34:57.539299 #18222:6d6b784] INFO -- : <AEMethod validate_quota> quota_limits: {:storage=>10737418240, :vms=>20, :cpu=>20000, :memory=>214748364800000} Notice the numbers here: Requested is less than the max value. [----] I, [2018-04-06T06:34:57.540845 #18222:6d6b784] INFO -- : <AEMethod validate_quota> Item: storage Used: (0) Requested: (1 089 470 464) Max: (10 737 418 240) Can we close this ticket? Thanks, Tina