Bug 1565025

Summary:	Stop building 389-ds-base on i686
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Jan Kurik <jkurik>
Component:	Changes Tracking	Assignee:	mreynolds
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:
Severity:	unspecified	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	29	CC:	bcotton, mreynolds, zbyszek
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:	ChangeAcceptedF28,SelfContainedChange
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2019-10-29 17:11:34 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jan Kurik 2018-04-09 07:44:10 UTC

This is a tracking bug for Change: Stop building 389-ds-base on i686
For more details, see: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/389-ds-base-remove-686

389-ds-base does not work properly on i686 hardware in regards to atomic types.

Comment 1 Jan Kurik 2018-08-14 11:07:03 UTC

This bug appears to have been reported against 'rawhide' during the Fedora 29 development cycle.
Changing version to '29'.

Comment 2 Ben Cotton 2018-08-14 13:12:47 UTC

According to the Fedora 29 schedule[1], today is the deadline for changes to be in a testable state. If your change is ready to be tested, please set the status to ON_QA. A list of incomplete changes will be sent to FESCo tomorrow for evaluation. If you know your change will not be ready for Fedora 29, you can set the version to rawhide and notify bcotton.

[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/29/Schedule

Comment 3 Ben Cotton 2018-08-15 11:24:07 UTC

Correction: please set the status to "MODIFIED" when the change is testable. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Policy#Change_Checkpoint:_Completion_deadline

Comment 4 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 2018-08-18 19:49:08 UTC

So... this change was about already implemented when filed. Let's mark it as ON_QA, since those builds without i686 have been out for a while. (I guess CLOSED would be also appropriate.)