Bug 1565541

Summary:	packaging: Ansible playbook to set ovn cluster tunnel should accept long network names
Product:	[oVirt] ovirt-engine	Reporter:	Marcin Mirecki <mmirecki>
Component:	Setup.Engine	Assignee:	Marcin Mirecki <mmirecki>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	msheena
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	4.3.0	CC:	bugs, danken, eedri, eheftman, mburman, mmirecki, ylavi
Target Milestone:	ovirt-4.2.6	Flags:	rule-engine: ovirt-4.2+ ylavi: exception+
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	ovirt-engine-4.2.6.1_SNAPSHOT-89.g295078e.0.scratch.master.el7ev.noarch.rpm	Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:	Previously, it was not possible to define long network names when modifying the tunnelling network for OVN controllers. In this release, a script has been provided to enable long network names to be used for tunnelling network definitions.	Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-09-03 15:09:55 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	Network	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Marcin Mirecki 2018-04-10 09:16:16 UTC

The ansible playbook (packaging/playbooks/ovirt-provider-ovn-driver.yml) which allows to change the tunneling network on a cluster currently requires the vdsm network name.
It should be possible to use the long network name for this.

Comment 1 Yaniv Kaul 2018-04-10 13:57:37 UTC

Severity?

Comment 2 Eyal Edri 2018-06-14 12:54:19 UTC

testing JIRA sync, please don't verify this bug yet!

Comment 3 msheena 2018-08-08 10:56:00 UTC

verified on: 
4.2.6.1_SNAPSHOT-89.g295078e.0.scratch.master.el7ev

Comment 4 msheena 2018-08-08 11:03:27 UTC

Additional version verification info:
ovirt-provider-ovn-1.2.14-1.el7ev.noarch
openvswitch-ovn-common-2.9.0-55.el7fdp.x86_64
openvswitch-ovn-central-2.9.0-55.el7fdp.x86_64
ovirt-provider-ovn-driver-1.2.14-1.el7ev.noarch

Comment 5 Emma Heftman 2018-08-30 10:57:31 UTC

Marcin, the information you added to the Docs text field is important but this is not the right place for it. I am removing it from this field and have opened a new bug to deal with it in the documentation.

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1623865