Bug 1566393
Summary: | When registering a VM that has disks on detached SD, error appears in engine.log, showing null as the SD name | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [oVirt] ovirt-engine | Reporter: | Natalie Gavrielov <ngavrilo> | ||||
Component: | BLL.Storage | Assignee: | Maor <mlipchuk> | ||||
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | Evelina Shames <eshames> | ||||
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |||||
Priority: | unspecified | ||||||
Version: | 4.2.2.6 | CC: | bugs, ngavrilo, ylavi | ||||
Target Milestone: | ovirt-4.2.4 | Flags: | rule-engine:
ovirt-4.2+
ylavi: exception+ |
||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||
Fixed In Version: | ovirt-engine-4.2.4 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | ||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||
Last Closed: | 2018-06-26 08:45:17 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||
oVirt Team: | Storage | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||
Embargoed: | |||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Natalie Gavrielov
2018-04-12 08:51:19 UTC
The error message is when storage domain does not exists in the Data Center. The same can also be when the storage domain does not exists in the setup at all. Therefore we can not know the name of the storage domain. Will changing the name to 'unknown' will be better? Like so: "Storage Domain 'unknown' with id 'dd0bf7a0-9a84-4290-9568-6e0c3538f886', could not be found for disk alias...." (In reply to Maor from comment #2) > Will changing the name to 'unknown' will be better? > Like so: > "Storage Domain 'unknown' with id 'dd0bf7a0-9a84-4290-9568-6e0c3538f886', > could not be found for disk alias...." I think it's best to display the actual name of the storage domain. (In reply to Natalie Gavrielov from comment #3) > (In reply to Maor from comment #2) > > Will changing the name to 'unknown' will be better? > > Like so: > > "Storage Domain 'unknown' with id 'dd0bf7a0-9a84-4290-9568-6e0c3538f886', > > could not be found for disk alias...." > > I think it's best to display the actual name of the storage domain. I mean, to find a way to do so Maor, I think it is better to display 'unknown' than 'null', but it would still look like a bug. The optimal solution is to display the name. (In reply to Natalie Gavrielov from comment #5) > Maor, > > I think it is better to display 'unknown' than 'null', but it would still > look like a bug. > The optimal solution is to display the name. The solution should be comprehensive for all use cases including a use case when the storage domains does not exists in the setup. For this use case there is no way to know the storage domains' names. (In reply to Maor from comment #6) > (In reply to Natalie Gavrielov from comment #5) > > Maor, > > > > I think it is better to display 'unknown' than 'null', but it would still > > look like a bug. > > The optimal solution is to display the name. > > The solution should be comprehensive for all use cases including a use case > when the storage domains does not exists in the setup. > For this use case there is no way to know the storage domains' names. Let's go with the 'unknown' for now, it will be better than null Verified. ovirt-engine-4.2.4.2-0.1.el7_3.noarch This bugzilla is included in oVirt 4.2.4 release, published on June 26th 2018. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in oVirt 4.2.4 release, it has been closed with a resolution of CURRENT RELEASE. If the solution does not work for you, please open a new bug report. |