Bug 1569389

Summary: FTS relevance field is poorly formatted
Product: [Community] Bugzilla Reporter: Jeff Fearn 🐞 <jfearn>
Component: Query/Bug ListAssignee: Jeff Fearn 🐞 <jfearn>
Status: CLOSED NEXTRELEASE QA Contact: tools-bugs <tools-bugs>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 5.0CC: khong, qgong
Target Milestone: 5.0   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 5.0.4-rh5 Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-06-15 05:44:52 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Jeff Fearn 🐞 2018-04-19 07:59:16 UTC
Description of problem:
The relevance field can get printed in scientific notation, making it not so useful for people.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.0

How reproducible:
Easy

Steps to Reproduce:
1. https://beta-bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?bug_status=__all__&content=Host%20has%20asynchronous%20running%20tasks&list_id=8695414&order=Importance&query_format=specific

Actual results:
values like: 8.33194e-06

Expected results:
Maybe truncate at 5 decimal places?

Additional info:

Comment 1 Rony Gong 🔥 2018-06-13 06:36:08 UTC
Tested on QA environment
Result: Pass

Comment 2 Jeff Fearn 🐞 2018-06-15 05:44:52 UTC
This issue has been resolved and is available for testing on https://beta-bugzilla.redhat.com it will be available in production after the Bugzilla 5 migration.

If you find issue when testing on Beta Bugzilla please open a new bug.