Bug 157137

Summary: Re-attaching of USB Mass storage device fails unless usb-storage is rmmod-ed
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Eugene Roux <eroux>
Component: kernelAssignee: Dave Jones <davej>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: davidz, pfrields, wtogami
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-05-10 21:31:57 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Eugene Roux 2005-05-07 13:47:15 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.7) Gecko/20050416 Galeon/1.3.20

Description of problem:
If I connect my external hard disk, a 120G WDC HDD in a Cypress Semiconductor USB-2.0 IDE Adapter, usbcore will load usb-storage and gnome-volume-manager / Nautilus will automount the drive.

If I then unmount and disconnect the device it will not be re-mounted on re-connection. D-BUS will see it and HAL, at least according to the HAL Device Manager, detects it.

If, however, I rmmod usb-storage after I disconnect the device it gets automounted just fine on reconnection.

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
kernel-2.6.11-1.1286_FC4

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Connect Cypress external HDD
2. gnome-volume-manager automounts it
3. Unmount and disconnect external HDD
4. Re-connect external HDD
5. gnome-volume-manager does /not/ automount

Actual Results:  gnome-volume-manager does not automount the external HDD

Expected Results:  gnome-volume-manager should automount the external HDD

Additional info:

kernel-2.6.11-1.1286_FC4
hal-0.5.1-1
gnome-volume-manager-1.3.1-1
dbus-0.33-2
udev-057-3
hotplug-2004_09_23-5

Comment 1 David Zeuthen 2005-05-10 21:31:57 UTC
This surely looks like a duplicate of bug 156167.

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 156167 ***