Bug 157177
Summary: | segfaults on startup | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | John Ellson <john.ellson> |
Component: | sodipodi | Assignee: | Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora> |
Status: | CLOSED RAWHIDE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | bugs.michael, compton, covex, toniw |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-06-19 17:56:54 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 162161 |
Description
John Ellson
2005-05-08 12:57:24 UTC
Fixed in CVS FC-3 with a patch from gentoo; Rebuild done, should be published soon. Can somebody close this? Thanks. Bug report is about "devel", but there is no sodipodi in "devel". There is only the older binary copied from FC-3: devel: sodipodi-0.34-2.x86_64.rpm FC-3: sodipodi-0.34-4.x86_64.rpm If sodipodi is obsolete, devel binary ought to get removed. (In reply to comment #2) > Bug report is about "devel", Sorry, didn't see that. Also happens with FC3 > but there is no sodipodi in "devel". There is only > the older binary copied from FC-3: > > devel: sodipodi-0.34-2.x86_64.rpm > FC-3: sodipodi-0.34-4.x86_64.rpm > > If sodipodi is obsolete, devel binary ought to get removed. Probably could someone rebuild sodipodi for fc4 too? segfaults for me too sodipodi-0.34-2.src.rpm sodipodi was killed during Fedora pre-Extras in November 2004. It should not have been copied into the FC4 repository. I submitted a remove request some minutes ago. If somebody wants to bring it back to life, that must start with work in Fedora Extras CVS first. Shall sodipodi be added to the orphaned packages list then? http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages (In reply to comment #6) > Shall sodipodi be added to the orphaned packages list then? > > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/OrphanedPackages No, not needed, quoting https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-commits/2005-March/msg00599.html "Removing sodipodi (was replaced by inkscape)" Closing this. Reopening, since the remove requests have still not been fulfilled. *** Bug 161863 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** Ehm, so what is the status now? Sodipodi "was removed" but is still in FC4 extras repository? See comment 5 -- waiting for somebody with repository access to remove the old binary packages. So, this has been fixed finally. |