Bug 1571968
Summary: | nftables: man page implies "insert ... position ..." uses a rule offset | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Eric Garver <egarver> |
Component: | nftables | Assignee: | Phil Sutter <psutter> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Jiri Peska <jpeska> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | Mirek Jahoda <mjahoda> |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 7.6 | CC: | jpeska, mjahoda, psutter, todoleza |
Target Milestone: | rc | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | nftables-0.8-9.el7 | Doc Type: | Enhancement |
Doc Text: |
`position` in an *nftables* add or insert rule is replaced by `handle` and `index`
With this update of the _nftables_ packages, the `position` parameter in an add or insert rule has been deprecated and replaced by the `handle` and `index` arguments. This syntax is more consistent with the replace and delete commands.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-10-30 10:38:13 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Eric Garver
2018-04-25 20:07:36 UTC
Upstream commit to backport: commit effb881c9cef28aca47adeec5014e0457507539e Author: Phil Sutter <phil> Date: Wed May 9 16:03:40 2018 +0200 Deprecate add/insert rule 'position' argument Instead, use 'handle' keyword for the same effect since that is more consistent with respect to replace/delete commands. The old keyword is still supported for backwards compatibility and also listed in man page along with a hint that it shouldn't be used anymore. Signed-off-by: Phil Sutter <phil> Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo> Based on our e-mail communication, I've just written a draft of a RN description in the Doc Text field. Could you please check it? Hi Mirek, (In reply to Mirek Jahoda from comment #7) > Based on our e-mail communication, I've just written a draft of a RN > description in the Doc Text field. Could you please check it? Looks good to me, thanks! Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2018:3154 |