Bug 157692
Summary: | add firefox.i386 to x86_64 distro | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Alexandre Oliva <oliva> |
Component: | distribution | Assignee: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Bill Nottingham <notting> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 4 | CC: | caillon, rvokal |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-05-16 17:08:50 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | 152944 | ||
Bug Blocks: |
Description
Alexandre Oliva
2005-05-13 19:55:08 UTC
We currently have no good UI for: a) setting this sort of a preference b) letting the user know why they'd want to pick one or the other Moreover, I don't think the scripts have been tested correctly for running, say, both 32 and 64-bit browser instances at the same time (presumably, they'd trip over the lock file.) At this point, I think this is WONTFIX. I was thinking command line, not starting it from menus or so, but I can see the point. As for the scripts, if you have a running firefox, running any other firefox will just get the running one to open the requested URL, due to communitation (I suppose) through the X server. So, yes, it's confusing. But if we could just add it to the x86_64 distro, even if not installed by default, it would make things much simpler on the update side. |