Bug 1577719

Summary: upstream URL reference in the rpm header is unreachable/dead
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 8 Reporter: Christian Horn <chorn>
Component: chrpathAssignee: Marek Polacek <mpolacek>
Status: CLOSED WONTFIX QA Contact: qe-baseos-tools-bugs
Severity: low Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 8.1CC: law
Target Milestone: pre-dev-freezeKeywords: EasyFix
Target Release: 8.1   
Hardware: All   
OS: All   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2020-01-14 16:35:35 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Christian Horn 2018-05-14 03:49:43 UTC
Description of problem:
upstream URL reference in the rpm header is unreachable/dead

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
chrpath-0.16-0.el7.x86_64.rpm

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
[chris@Гага́рин Downloads]$ rpm -qi /mnt/store/deploy/repos/rhel-7.5/Packages/chrpath-0.16-0.el7.x86_64.rpm|egrep '^Name|^URL'
warning: /mnt/store/deploy/repos/rhel-7.5/Packages/chrpath-0.16-0.el7.x86_64.rpm: Header V3 RSA/SHA256 Signature, key ID fd431d51: NOKEY
Name        : chrpath
URL         : ftp://ftp.hungry.com/pub/hungry/chrpath/
[chris@Гага́рин Downloads]$ 
$ ftp ftp://ftp.hungry.com/
ftp: ftp://ftp.hungry.com/: Name or service not known
ftp> 
$

Actual results:
upstream url not accessible.

Expected results:
upstream reference should be correct.

Additional info:

Comment 2 Marek Polacek 2018-05-22 19:57:33 UTC
I don't think chrpath deserves a respin in 7.6 just because of this.

Comment 3 Christian Horn 2018-05-23 01:22:13 UTC
If respin means that extra rounds of QA would be done or such, it's certainly not worth it, I agree.

Comment 4 Marek Polacek 2018-06-01 19:55:54 UTC
This package did not make the 7.6 ACL. Moving out for consideration at 7.7
planning phase. Note that this is not a commitment to fix in the 7.7 release.

Comment 8 Jeff Law 2020-01-14 16:35:35 UTC
I don't see a scenario where we're likely to want to burn QE resources on this, so I'm just going to close.