Bug 1579214

Summary:	hammer host list takes a long time
Product:	Red Hat Satellite	Reporter:	Michal Dekan <mdekan>
Component:	Hosts	Assignee:	satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status:	CLOSED WONTFIX	QA Contact:	tstrych
Severity:	high	Docs Contact:
Priority:	unspecified
Version:	6.3.1	CC:	akarimi, bshahu, inecas, jhutar, psuriset, saime, syangsao, tbrisker, yferszt
Target Milestone:	Unspecified	Keywords:	Performance, Triaged
Target Release:	Unused
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2020-01-15 20:29:57 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Michal Dekan 2018-05-17 07:44:37 UTC

Description of problem:

It takes ~20 seconds to display 229 hosts with hammer on the box which is powerful enough to definitely has a better time (24 CPUs, 50GB RAM).

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):

satellite-6.3.1-3.el7sat.noarch

How reproducible:


Steps to Reproduce:

Satellite 6.3.1 running on the similar box like mentioned above with 229 hosts attached to it.

Actual results:

[root@gprfc018 ~]# time hammer -u admin -p XXXX host list
----|-------------------------------------|------------------|------------|--------------|-------------------|---------------------------|----------------------
ID  | NAME                                | OPERATING SYSTEM | HOST GROUP | IP           | MAC               | CONTENT VIEW              | LIFECYCLE ENVIRONMENT
----|-------------------------------------|------------------|------------|--------------|-------------------|---------------------------|----------------------
1   | gprfc018.sbu.lab.eng.bos.redhat.com | RedHat 7.5       |            | 10.16.154.51 | d4:be:d9:b3:90:2b |                           |                      [...]
89  | gprfc027container78.example.com     | RedHat 7.4       | HostGroup  | 172.27.0.78  | 02:42:ac:1b:00:4e | Default Organization View | Library              ----|-------------------------------------|------------------|------------|--------------|-------------------|---------------------------|----------------------

real    0m21.635s
user    0m2.309s
sys     0m0.221s

Expected results:

Should be faster, there was a customer complain about slow hammer host list (case attached) in satellite 6.2.11. This test reveals that its not much better in current 6.3 (6.3.1)

Additional info:

Comment 12 Bryan Kearney 2019-12-03 16:34:26 UTC

The Satellite Team is attempting to provide an accurate backlog of bugzilla requests which we feel will be resolved in the next few releases. We do not believe this bugzilla will meet that criteria, and have plans to close it out in 1 month. This is not a reflection on the validity of the request, but a reflection of the many priorities for the product. If you have any concerns about this, feel free to contact Red Hat Technical Support or your account team. If we do not hear from you, we will close this bug out. Thank you.

Comment 13 Bryan Kearney 2020-01-15 20:29:57 UTC

Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and while we recognize that it is a valid request, we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. This is due to other priorities for the product, and not a reflection on the request itself. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please do not reopen. Instead, feel free to contact Red Hat Technical Support. Thank you.

Comment 14 Bryan Kearney 2020-01-15 20:30:07 UTC

Thank you for your interest in Satellite 6. We have evaluated this request, and while we recognize that it is a valid request, we do not expect this to be implemented in the product in the foreseeable future. This is due to other priorities for the product, and not a reflection on the request itself. We are therefore closing this out as WONTFIX. If you have any concerns about this, please do not reopen. Instead, feel free to contact Red Hat Technical Support. Thank you.