Bug 1579451
Summary: | glibc: IP_BIND_ADDRESS_NO_PORT is not defined in <netinet/in.h> | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 | Reporter: | Ilya Shipitsin <chipitsine> |
Component: | glibc | Assignee: | Patsy Griffin <pfrankli> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | qe-baseos-tools-bugs |
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 7.5 | CC: | ashankar, codonell, dj, fweimer, mcermak, mnewsome, pfrankli, skolosov |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | Patch |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | glibc-2.17-299.el7 | Doc Type: | Bug Fix |
Doc Text: |
The library was missing new definitions in the netinet/in.h header, and this could cause some applications to fail to compile. The new definitions, including IP_BIND_ADDRESS_NO_PORT, IPPROTO_MPLS, MS_RMT_MASK, MS_LAZYTIME, AF_MPLS, AF_IB, PF_IB, and IP_CHECKSUM have been added. Applications requiring these definitions should now compile correctly.
|
Story Points: | --- |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-03-31 19:08:29 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1710258 |
Description
Ilya Shipitsin
2018-05-17 16:56:08 UTC
This feature from kernel 4.2 was backported into the Red Hat Enterprise Linux 7 kernel with the 7.4 minor release, so we could add the constant to the glibc headers as well. It is really just the constant itself, and it's included in upstream glibc already, so I'm setting the Patch keyword. Verified with the reproducer from https://bugs.centos.org/view.php?id=14828, the bug has been fixed in glibc-2.17-299.el7. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2020:0989 |