Bug 1581449
Summary: | [RFE] librbd/libcephfs/librgw should ignore rados_mon/osd_op_timeouts options | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Ceph Storage | Reporter: | Vikhyat Umrao <vumrao> |
Component: | RADOS | Assignee: | Josh Durgin <jdurgin> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Manohar Murthy <mmurthy> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 2.5 | CC: | bhubbard, ceph-eng-bugs, dzafman, kchai, mhackett, nojha |
Target Milestone: | rc | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | 4.* | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2020-05-13 21:23:48 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Vikhyat Umrao
2018-05-22 19:15:29 UTC
If we are "making librbd/libcephfs/rgw ignore them" then this would not be a RADOS core change right? It would involve changes in the code that is *using* librados, not in librados itself, or am I missing something? (In reply to Brad Hubbard from comment #2) > If we are "making librbd/libcephfs/rgw ignore them" then this would not be a > RADOS core change right? It would involve changes in the code that is > *using* librados, not in librados itself, or am I missing something? I am not sure Brad. If that is the case I can split this RFE in three RFE's. Josh mentioned he wanted to add some safeguard to these options so that these three libraries cannot make use of these options. Updating the QA Contact to a Hemant. Hemant will be rerouting them to the appropriate QE Associate. Regards, Giri Updating the QA Contact to a Hemant. Hemant will be rerouting them to the appropriate QE Associate. Regards, Giri |