Bug 1581865
Summary: | Review Request: flatpak-module-tools - Tools for maintaining Flatpak applications and runtimes as Fedora modules | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Owen Taylor <otaylor> |
Component: | Package Review | Assignee: | Kalev Lember <klember> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | klember, package-review |
Target Milestone: | --- | Flags: | klember:
fedora-review+
|
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-08-04 21:45:50 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Owen Taylor
2018-05-23 19:45:20 UTC
Fedora review flatpak-module-tools-0.2-1.fc27.src.rpm 2018-05-24 $ rpmlint flatpak-module-tools-0.2-1.fc27.src.rpm \ flatpak-module-tools flatpak-module-tools.src: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) runtimes -> run times, run-times, centimes flatpak-module-tools.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtimes -> run times, run-times, centimes flatpak-module-tools.noarch: E: explicit-lib-dependency libmodulemd flatpak-module-tools.noarch: W: spelling-error Summary(en_US) runtimes -> run times, run-times, centimes flatpak-module-tools.noarch: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US runtimes -> run times, run-times, centimes flatpak-module-tools.noarch: W: no-manual-page-for-binary flatpak-module 2 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 1 errors, 5 warnings. + OK ! needs attention + rpmlint warnings are harmless and can be ignored + The package is named according to Fedora packaging guidelines + The spec file name matches the base package name. + The package meets the Packaging Guidelines + The package is licensed with a Fedora approved license and meets the Licensing Guidelines. + The license field in the spec file matches the actual license + The license text (LICENSE) is included in %license + Spec file is written in American English + Spec file is legible + Upstream sources match the sources in the srpm SHA512 (flatpak-module-tools-0.2.tar.gz) = 9481ee9c0f6d10acbf4bc2dec9663e3b980c0e051849a154aaab92be847458e63532800ebd66e6adb26fd8f188f235fa1e85e671d4f9432728418ad0153ed34c SHA512 (Download/flatpak-module-tools-0.2.tar.gz) = 9481ee9c0f6d10acbf4bc2dec9663e3b980c0e051849a154aaab92be847458e63532800ebd66e6adb26fd8f188f235fa1e85e671d4f9432728418ad0153ed34c + Package builds in koji n/a ExcludeArch bugs filed + BuildRequires look sane n/a locale handling n/a ldconfig in %post and %postun + Package does not bundle copies of system libraries n/a Package isn't relocatable + Package owns all the directories it creates + No duplicate files in %files + Permissions are properly set + Consistent use of macros + The package must contain code or permissible content n/a Large documentation files should go in -doc subpackage + Files marked %doc should not affect the runtime of application n/a Static libraries should be in -static n/a Development files should be in -devel n/a -devel must require the fully versioned base n/a Packages should not contain libtool .la files n/a Proper .desktop file handling + Doesn't own files or directories already owned by other packages + Filenames are valid UTF-8 Looks nice and clean. APPROVED (fedrepo-req-admin): The Pagure repository was created at https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/flatpak-module-tools flatpak-module-tools-0.2-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-90c562c08a Builds: F28: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1084499 F29: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1084498 flatpak-module-tools-0.2-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-90c562c08a flatpak-module-tools-0.3-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-b22c558491 flatpak-module-tools-0.3-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-b22c558491 flatpak-module-tools-0.4-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-09514eaca0 flatpak-module-tools-0.4-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-09514eaca0 flatpak-module-tools-0.6-1.fc28 has been submitted as an update to Fedora 28. https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-3210cc23f4 flatpak-module-tools-0.6-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 testing repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Updates_Testing for instructions on how to install test updates. You can provide feedback for this update here: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2018-3210cc23f4 flatpak-module-tools-0.6-1.fc28 has been pushed to the Fedora 28 stable repository. If problems still persist, please make note of it in this bug report. |