Bug 158443

Summary: celestia - FC4 x86_64 rebuild failed
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Thorsten Leemhuis <fedora>
Component: celestiaAssignee: Steven Pritchard <steve>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact: Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhideCC: paolini, redhat-bugzilla
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 1.4.0-1 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2006-02-12 01:14:46 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 157553    
Attachments:
Description Flags
fix compile on 64-bit archs none

Description Thorsten Leemhuis 2005-05-22 12:30:47 UTC
This package failed to rebuild on x86_64 for FC4 Development around 2005-04-11
after an automated release bump. No build logs available afaics.

Comment 2 Maurizio Paolini 2005-10-25 14:00:10 UTC
the package rebuilds fine on an ia64 architecture if a patch is  
applied. Note that the problem actually refers to the FC4 version,  
not to the DEVEL version.  You can find more information, the patch 
and a working spec file in http://dmf.unicatt.it/~pasqui/celestia/  

Comment 3 Thorsten Leemhuis 2005-11-05 10:45:08 UTC
Created attachment 120754 [details]
fix compile on 64-bit archs

This patch agains current CVS fixes build on 64bit archs. Not the best solution
afaics, but works for me.

Steve, is it okay if I commit this to FC-4 and devel and request build?

Comment 4 Steven Pritchard 2005-11-08 15:45:01 UTC
I'll take care of it.  I have a few other issues that I'd like to try to address
before rebuilding.

Comment 5 Steven Pritchard 2006-02-12 01:14:46 UTC
The current version of celestia is 1.4.0 (or a post-1.4.0 CVS snapshot in the
devel branch).  It builds fine on x86_64.  I think I can safely close this bug,
but please let me know if I'm missing something.