Bug 158936
| Summary: | The package kernel-2.6.11-1.1363_FC4 is signed with an unknown GPG signature. Continue? | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Peter Ennis <peterennis> |
| Component: | up2date | Assignee: | Bret McMillan <bretm> |
| Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Fanny Augustin <fmoquete> |
| Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
| Priority: | medium | ||
| Version: | 4 | ||
| Target Milestone: | --- | ||
| Target Release: | --- | ||
| Hardware: | All | ||
| OS: | Linux | ||
| Whiteboard: | |||
| Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Bug Fix | |
| Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
| Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
| Last Closed: | 2006-11-05 16:30:21 UTC | Type: | --- |
| Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
| Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
| Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
| oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
| Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
| Embargoed: | |||
|
Description
Peter Ennis
2005-05-26 23:41:36 UTC
The package kernel-devel-2.6.11-1.1363_FC4 is signed with an unknown GPG signature. Continue? The package binutils-2.15.94.0.2.2-2 is signed with an unknown GPG signature. Continue? FC4T3 fresh install, downloaded keys as requested, why the mismatch? The package firefox-1.0.4-4 is signed with an unknown GPG signature. Continue? looks like it is happening for all packages, running as root, keys installed as root, no complaints when i ran yum, -- annoying as i have to hit ok for each package, -- can't decide which is worse, having no ignore all unsigned packages option, or not having them properly signed and recognized up2date was replaced by pirut and put (package pirut) as of FC5. Only FC5 and FC6 are currently fully supported; FC3 and FC4 are supported for security fixes only. If this bug occurs in FC3 or FC4 and is a security bug, please change the product to Fedora Extras and the version to match. If you can verify that the bug exists in RHEL as well, please change the product and version appropriately. The codebase for pirut and pup is quite different, but if a similar bug exists in pirut and pup in FC5 or FC6, please change the product to pirut and the version appropriately and update the bug report. We apologize that the bug was not fixed before now. The status will be changed to NEEDINFO, and if the bug is not updated with evidence that it is a security bug or a bug that affects RHEL, it will be closed. Closing per previous message. |