Bug 1589782
Summary: | [geo-rep]: Geo-replication in FAULTY state - CENTOS 6 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Community] GlusterFS | Reporter: | Kotresh HR <khiremat> | |
Component: | geo-replication | Assignee: | Kotresh HR <khiremat> | |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | ||
Severity: | high | Docs Contact: | ||
Priority: | unspecified | |||
Version: | mainline | CC: | amukherj, bugs, csaba, rallan, rhinduja, rhs-bugs, sankarshan, storage-qa-internal | |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Regression | |
Target Release: | --- | |||
Hardware: | Unspecified | |||
OS: | Unspecified | |||
Whiteboard: | ||||
Fixed In Version: | glusterfs-5.0 | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | ||
Clone Of: | 1569312 | |||
: | 1611111 (view as bug list) | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-10-23 15:11:13 UTC | Type: | Bug | |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | ||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | ||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | ||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | ||
Embargoed: | ||||
Bug Depends On: | 1569312 | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1611111 |
Comment 1
Kotresh HR
2018-06-11 11:50:23 UTC
REVIEW: https://review.gluster.org/20221 (geo-rep: Fix geo-rep for older versions of unshare) posted (#1) for review on master by Kotresh HR COMMIT: https://review.gluster.org/20221 committed in master by "Kotresh HR" <khiremat> with a commit message- geo-rep: Fix geo-rep for older versions of unshare Geo-rep mounts are private to worker. It uses mount namespace using unshare command to achieve the same. Well, the unshare command has to support '--propagation' option. So geo-rep breaks on the systems with older unshare version. The patch makes it fall back to lazy umount behaviour if the unshare does not support propagation option. fixes: bz#1589782 Change-Id: Ia614f068aede288d63ac62fea4461b1865066054 Signed-off-by: Kotresh HR <khiremat> This bug is getting closed because a release has been made available that should address the reported issue. In case the problem is still not fixed with glusterfs-5.0, please open a new bug report. glusterfs-5.0 has been announced on the Gluster mailinglists [1], packages for several distributions should become available in the near future. Keep an eye on the Gluster Users mailinglist [2] and the update infrastructure for your distribution. [1] https://lists.gluster.org/pipermail/announce/2018-October/000115.html [2] https://www.gluster.org/pipermail/gluster-users/ |