Bug 159373

Summary:	please include libvisual-plugins and libvisual-bmp in extras
Product:	[Fedora] Fedora	Reporter:	Lars G <researchlab>
Component:	libvisual	Assignee:	Aurelien Bompard <gauret>
Status:	CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE	QA Contact:	Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	rawhide	CC:	mpeters
Target Milestone:	---	Keywords:	FutureFeature
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	All
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	Enhancement
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-07-01 12:37:42 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Lars G 2005-06-02 02:45:47 UTC

playing with libvisual i realize that it would be nice to have the
libvisual-plugins package in extras.

as i'm trying to use it with beep-media-player from extras
the inclusion of libvisual-bmp from the same project would be usefull too.

without this two packages the chain to nice easy visual plugins is just not
complete.

thanks so much
lars

Comment 1 Aurelien Bompard 2005-06-12 07:12:53 UTC

Michael Peters packaged libvisual-plugins and asked for inclusion into Extras in
April, but somehow he did not commit it.
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-extras-list/2005-April/msg00830.html
Michael, is it ready ?

Comment 2 Michael A. Peters 2005-06-12 07:49:05 UTC

I will commit if needed but it does not build on x86 fc4 (it does build on ppc)
I've notified upstream and requested a fix from them.

Comment 3 Michael A. Peters 2005-06-19 00:46:01 UTC

libvisual-plugins is building on x86 and is in Extras CVS and should come to an
extras mirror near you soon, assuming the build system cooperates.

For libvisual-bmp - hopefully someone who uses bmp will decide to package it and
submit it to extras.

Comment 4 Aurelien Bompard 2005-07-01 12:37:42 UTC

libvisual is now in Extras, closing bug