Bug 1594262
Summary: | FFU: ERROR (ClientException): Unexpected API Error. on nova list output after OSP10 -> OSP11 | ||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Product: | Red Hat OpenStack | Reporter: | Chris Janiszewski <cjanisze> | ||||||
Component: | instack-undercloud | Assignee: | Jiri Stransky <jstransk> | ||||||
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Arik Chernetsky <achernet> | ||||||
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |||||||
Priority: | medium | ||||||||
Version: | 11.0 (Ocata) | CC: | ccamacho, jstransk, mburns, mcornea | ||||||
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | Triaged | ||||||
Target Release: | --- | ||||||||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||||||||
OS: | Unspecified | ||||||||
Whiteboard: | |||||||||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |||||||
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |||||||
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||||||||
Last Closed: | 2018-07-02 09:11:51 UTC | Type: | Bug | ||||||
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- | ||||||
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |||||||
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |||||||
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |||||||
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |||||||
Embargoed: | |||||||||
Attachments: |
|
Description
Chris Janiszewski
2018-06-22 13:10:50 UTC
Created attachment 1453729 [details]
sosreport-parta
Created attachment 1453730 [details]
sos-report-partb
Chris thanks for the report, can you please share more high level info about how was the OSP 10/11 repository situation different on the 1st and 2nd upgrade attempt: Did 1st attempt have OSP 11 repos enabled fully or somehow partially? Did you use subscription manager or rhos-release? In theory having OSP 10 repository enabled alongside OSP 11 shouldn't cause an issue, as the packages in OSP 11 repo would either be newer or the same, so the final set of RPMs should be the same too. That's assuming that *all* OSP 11 content was enabled. (Triaging as medium/medium for now, as re-run of the undercloud upgrade with only OSP 11 repos worked. Let's increase the prio if we manage to reproduce the issue.) I think this could potentially be a duplicate of BZ#1594265 it has been deployed with rhos release .. both repos (osp10 and osp11) have been enabled at the same time when it failed. I will have to go through that exercise multiple times in the next few days. I'll make note if I see it again. Got the same error today after osp10->osp11 upgrade (undercloud). Used latest CDN repos. Resolved by workaround from BZ in comment #4 [stack@test1-undercloud ~]$ nova list ERROR (ClientException): Unexpected API Error. Please report this at http://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/ and attach the Nova API log if possible. <class 'sqlalchemy.exc.ProgrammingError'> (HTTP 500) (Request-ID: req-490ce0c7-4055-4a25-8bcd-adccc8a43bbd) [stack@test1-undercloud ~]$ openstack server list Unexpected API Error. Please report this at http://bugs.launchpad.net/nova/ and attach the Nova API log if possible. <class 'sqlalchemy.exc.ProgrammingError'> (HTTP 500) (Request-ID: req-da19369a-93bf-44a7-8565-f45f38703ce9) [stack@test1-undercloud ~]$ sudo nova-manage db sync [stack@test1-undercloud ~]$ openstack server list +--------------------------------------+----------------------+--------+-----------------------+------------+ | ID | Name | Status | Networks | Image Name | +--------------------------------------+----------------------+--------+-----------------------+------------+ | c085c93f-8363-4224-ba48-d5a23fdc9f99 | testffu-controller-2 | ACTIVE | ctlplane=172.16.0.114 | | | 69b6c9c7-3545-447f-848e-968342f94bed | testffu-controller-0 | ACTIVE | ctlplane=172.16.0.106 | | | 8d4a79da-227f-4673-936b-7180e663cb4a | testffu-controller-1 | ACTIVE | ctlplane=172.16.0.107 | | | 5e662677-fca1-4a36-8f47-0509df285bfd | testffu-compute-1 | ACTIVE | ctlplane=172.16.0.113 | | | b854618b-0759-4ab6-9e4a-f885c93bf023 | testffu-compute-0 | ACTIVE | ctlplane=172.16.0.108 | | +--------------------------------------+----------------------+--------+-----------------------+------------+ *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1594265 *** |