Bug 159447
Summary: | Anaconda package selection should be more detailed | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Nick Barkas <linux4sure> |
Component: | anaconda | Assignee: | Anaconda Maintenance Team <anaconda-maint-list> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | Mike McLean <mikem> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | 3 | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2005-06-07 19:26:41 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Nick Barkas
2005-06-02 18:27:57 UTC
*** Bug 159446 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** i second that Finer grained and more detailed package selection like that of SUSE lnux would be wonderful. Having the package selection screen list every single package is difficult from a usability standpoint, especially when we're now pushing over 1800 packages. If there are specific packages you believe should be listed in the package selection screen, please file them as a bug against the comps component. Note that for FC5, package selection is going to be changing significantly as we are going to be doing major work on the back end of things. I'm not quite sure yet how this is going to translate into interface chunks. |