Bug 1595545

Summary:	Openstack Storage costs in chargeback is 0.00
Product:	Red Hat CloudForms Management Engine	Reporter:	Niladri Roy <niroy>
Component:	Reporting	Assignee:	Libor Pichler <lpichler>
Status:	CLOSED NOTABUG	QA Contact:	Dave Johnson <dajohnso>
Severity:	medium	Docs Contact:
Priority:	high
Version:	5.8.0	CC:	cpelland, dmetzger, jprause, jrafanie, lpichler, nachandr, niroy, obarenbo
Target Milestone:	GA
Target Release:	5.8.5
Hardware:	Unspecified
OS:	Unspecified
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:		Doc Type:	If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2018-09-04 11:44:08 UTC	Type:	Bug
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	CFME Core	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	1572700

Description Niladri Roy 2018-06-27 06:24:26 UTC

Description of problem:
Storage Used Cost, Storage Allocated Cost, Fixed Storage Cost 1 values are $0.00 in chargeback report

Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
5.8.3.4

How reproducible:
Everytime at Cu env

Steps to Reproduce:
1. 
2.
3.

Actual results:
Storage costs are zero

Expected results:
Storage costs should be non-zero

Additional info:
Provider is Openstack, rate assignment has been done on tenants

Comment 3 Joe Rafaniello 2018-07-31 16:18:38 UTC

Niladri, this sounds very similar to bug #1567254, and fixed in 5.8.4.3, via bug #1576101.  Can you try with 5.8.4.3?

Comment 4 Niladri Roy 2018-08-01 05:51:02 UTC

Hi Joe,

This is doesn't look similar to your mentioned BZ as the report has many columns (not only the Total costs) included and only the storage costs are zero

Please see comment #2 for the reproducer details which has the Cu DB dump and the report name mentioned.

Comment 5 Joe Rafaniello 2018-08-01 14:36:54 UTC

Thanks, I'll take a look.  By the way, with bug #1567254, you only needed one of the required fields excluded from the report for some dependent fields to be empty/0, so the number of fields may or may not be a good indicator.

Comment 13 dmetzger 2018-09-04 11:44:08 UTC

Closing this ticket per the requestors request / comment:

"There was no response from the Cu on my support case related to this BZ.

I went ahead and archived the case today. I think the BZ also can be closed now."