Bug 159716

Summary: ghostscript fails to update
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: Thomas Antony <thomas>
Component: ghostscriptAssignee: Tim Waugh <twaugh>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Mike McLean <mikem>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: rawhide   
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: x86_64   
OS: Linux   
URL: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=159598
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-06-07 13:32:57 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Thomas Antony 2005-06-07 13:26:53 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de-DE; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050524 Fedora/1.0.4-4 Firefox/1.0.4

Description of problem:
I still can't update ghostscript.

[thomas@pc ~]$ sudo yum update
...
...

...Transaction Summary
=============================================================================
Install      0 Package(s)
Update      42 Package(s)
Remove       0 Package(s)
Total download size: 123 M
Is this ok [y/N]: y
Downloading Packages:
Running Transaction Test
Finished Transaction Test
Transaction Check Error:   file /usr/bin/bdftops from install of ghostscript-8.15-0.rc3.1 conflicts with file from package ghostscript-7.07-40
  file /usr/bin/dvipdf from install of ghostscript-8.15-0.rc3.1 conflicts with file from package ghostscript-7.07-40
  file /usr/bin/eps2eps from install of ghostscript-8.15-0.rc3.1 conflicts with file from package ghostscript-7.07-40
  file /usr/bin/fixmswrd.pl from install of ghostscript-8.15-0.rc3.1 conflicts with file from package ghostscript-7.07-40
  file /usr/bin/font2c from install of ghostscript-8.15-0.rc3.1 conflicts with file from package ghostscript-7.07-40
  file /usr/bin/gsbj from install of ghostscript-8.15-0.rc3.1 conflicts with file from package ghostscript-7.07-40
  file /usr/bin/gsdj from install of ghostscript-8.15-0.rc3.1 conflicts with file from package ghostscript-7.07-40
  file /usr/bin/gsdj500 from install of ghostscript-8.15-0.rc3.1 conflicts with file from package ghostscript-7.07-40
  file /usr/bin/gslj from install of ghostscript-8.15-0.rc3.1 conflicts with file from package ghostscript-7.07-40
  file /usr/bin/gslp from install of ghostscript-8.15-0.rc3.1 conflicts with file from package ghostscript-7.07-40
  file /usr/bin/gsnd from install of ghostscript-8.15-0.rc3.1 conflicts with file from package ghostscript-7.07-40
  file /usr/bin/lprsetup.sh from install of ghostscript-8.15-0.rc3.1 conflicts with file from package ghostscript-7.07-40
  file /usr/bin/pdf2dsc from install of ghostscript-8.15-0.rc3.1 conflicts with file from package ghostscript-7.07-40
  file /usr/bin/pdf2ps from install of ghostscript-8.15-0.rc3.1 conflicts with file from package ghostscript-7.07-40
  file /usr/bin/pdfopt from install of ghostscript-8.15-0.rc3.1 conflicts with file from package ghostscript-7.07-40
...
...


A additional yum update prints again
...
Added 343 new packages, deleted 292 old in 2.78 seconds
Resolving Dependencies
--> Populating transaction set with selected packages. Please wait.
---> Package ghostscript.x86_64 0:8.15-0.rc3.1 set to be updated
--> Running transaction check
--> Processing Dependency: libijs.so()(64bit) for package: gimp-print
--> Processing Dependency: libgs.so.7()(64bit) for package: ImageMagick
--> Finished Dependency Resolution
Error: Missing Dependency: libijs.so()(64bit) is needed by package gimp-print
Error: Missing Dependency: libgs.so.7()(64bit) is needed by package ImageMagick


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
8.15-0.rc3.1

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.yum update

Actual Results:  update failes

Expected Results:  ghostscript should be updated to 8.15

Additional info:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=159598

Comment 1 Thomas Antony 2005-06-07 13:32:57 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of 159715 ***