Bug 1597218
Summary: | Dynamic provisioned Block PV has an invalid field pv.spec.awsElasticBlockStore.fsType | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | OpenShift Container Platform | Reporter: | Qin Ping <piqin> |
Component: | Storage | Assignee: | Jan Safranek <jsafrane> |
Status: | CLOSED ERRATA | QA Contact: | Wenqi He <wehe> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | 3.10.0 | CC: | aos-bugs, aos-storage-staff, jsafrane, lxia |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | 3.11.0 | ||
Hardware: | Unspecified | ||
OS: | Unspecified | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2019-01-30 15:19:31 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Qin Ping
2018-07-02 09:41:56 UTC
Upstream PR: https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/65705 Both PRs in #comment 1 and #comment 2 are already merged, move to QA to check whether the issue is fixed or not. Tested on below version: openshift v3.10.87 kubernetes v1.10.0+b81c8f8 Still repro. The fix seemed to merge to 3.11 and did not back port to 3.10, are we going to fix this without 3.10 back port? If yes, Please set the correct target release and will verify again on 3.11. Thanks. IMO it's pretty low prio bug that does not affect anything and we don't need to backport it into 3.10. Please check it's fixed in 3.11.z. Tested on below version: openshift v3.11.57 kubernetes v1.11.0+d4cacc0 # uname -a Linux ip-172-18-4-48.ec2.internal 3.10.0-957.1.3.el7.x86_64 #1 SMP Thu Nov 15 17:36:42 UTC 2018 x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux # cat /etc/redhat-release Red Hat Enterprise Linux Server release 7.6 (Maipo) # oc get pv pvc-e9719134-0295-11e9-9dd9-0e66e91de6d0 -o yaml apiVersion: v1 kind: PersistentVolume metadata: annotations: kubernetes.io/createdby: aws-ebs-dynamic-provisioner pv.kubernetes.io/bound-by-controller: "yes" pv.kubernetes.io/provisioned-by: kubernetes.io/aws-ebs creationTimestamp: 2018-12-18T07:24:11Z finalizers: - kubernetes.io/pv-protection labels: failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/region: us-east-1 failure-domain.beta.kubernetes.io/zone: us-east-1d name: pvc-e9719134-0295-11e9-9dd9-0e66e91de6d0 resourceVersion: "10885" selfLink: /api/v1/persistentvolumes/pvc-e9719134-0295-11e9-9dd9-0e66e91de6d0 uid: ea10c57a-0295-11e9-9dd9-0e66e91de6d0 spec: accessModes: - ReadWriteOnce awsElasticBlockStore: volumeID: aws://us-east-1d/vol-01fe2fb4e7706097e capacity: storage: 1Gi claimRef: apiVersion: v1 kind: PersistentVolumeClaim name: pvc namespace: default resourceVersion: "10879" uid: e9719134-0295-11e9-9dd9-0e66e91de6d0 persistentVolumeReclaimPolicy: Delete storageClassName: gp2 volumeMode: Block status: phase: Bound There is no fstype. Fixed, thanks. Since the problem described in this bug report should be resolved in a recent advisory, it has been closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For information on the advisory, and where to find the updated files, follow the link below. If the solution does not work for you, open a new bug report. https://access.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2019:0096 |