Bug 1597390
Summary: | [RFE] Description of public key based authorization seems to be missing a phrase | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Red Hat Storage] Red Hat Gluster Storage | Reporter: | Adam Scerra <ascerra> |
Component: | doc-Deploying_RHHI | Assignee: | storage-doc |
Status: | CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE | QA Contact: | bipin <bshetty> |
Severity: | low | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | rhhi-1.1 | CC: | ascerra, asriram, bshetty, rhs-bugs, sankarshan, sasundar, seamurph |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | RHHI-V 1.5 | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-12-17 09:32:29 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: | |||
Bug Depends On: | |||
Bug Blocks: | 1724792, 1534399 |
Description
Adam Scerra
2018-07-02 20:23:45 UTC
This was rewritten explicitly to remove "passwordless" since it's a) not used as often as 'key-based' or 'without a password' and b) harder to translate since it isn't actually a word. We can be more specific about the point being to configure SSH using keys without a passphrase, but passwordless itself is probably not a good idea except as an "also known as" definition. Would appreciate your thoughts here Adam. I do understand the careful use of the non word "passwordless". I believe 'without a password' works just fine, I feel that the point of configuring these keys gets slightly lost in translation. The words 'without a password' would ensure the user knows exactly why they are doing what they are doing. |