Bug 1598488

Summary: virt-who checkin fails with undefined method `[]' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError)
Product: Red Hat Satellite Reporter: Justin Sherrill <jsherril>
Component: Subscription ManagementAssignee: satellite6-bugs <satellite6-bugs>
Status: CLOSED DUPLICATE QA Contact: Katello QA List <katello-qa-list>
Severity: unspecified Docs Contact:
Priority: unspecified    
Version: 6.4   
Target Milestone: Unspecified   
Target Release: Unused   
Hardware: Unspecified   
OS: Unspecified   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: Doc Type: If docs needed, set a value
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2018-07-05 16:35:34 UTC Type: Bug
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description Justin Sherrill 2018-07-05 15:46:25 UTC
Description of problem:

2018-07-05T15:28:06 [E|bac|4cd3d] undefined method `[]' for nil:NilClass (NoMethodError)
 | /home/vagrant/git/katello/app/lib/actions/katello/host/hypervisors.rb:29:in `block (2 levels) in parse_hypervisors'
 | /home/vagrant/git/katello/app/lib/actions/katello/host/hypervisors.rb:25:in `map'
 | /home/vagrant/git/katello/app/lib/actions/katello/host/hypervisors.rb:25:in `block in parse_hypervisors'
 | /home/vagrant/git/katello/app/lib/actions/katello/host/hypervisors.rb:23:in `each'
 | /home/vagrant/git/katello/app/lib/actions/katello/host/hypervisors.rb:23:in `parse_hypervisors'



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
6.4

How reproducible:
always

Steps to Reproduce:
1.  Perform virt-who checking manually 2x  (virt-who -od)

Actual results:
2nd virt-who checkin will fail (first may fail if it was not the first time) 

Expected results:
2nd virt-who checkin should pass

Additional info:

candlepin changed the results from the hypervisor checkin to only include uuids for the 'unchanged' set of hypervisors results

Comment 1 Justin Sherrill 2018-07-05 16:35:34 UTC

*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1592281 ***