Bug 159949
Summary: | RFE: Apply Patch should have "interactive merge" | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora | Reporter: | Dave Malcolm <dmalcolm> |
Component: | eclipse | Assignee: | Andrew Overholt <overholt> |
Status: | CLOSED WONTFIX | QA Contact: | |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | medium | ||
Version: | rawhide | CC: | akurtako, eclipse-bugs |
Target Milestone: | --- | Keywords: | FutureFeature |
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | All | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | Enhancement | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2010-08-25 15:24:27 UTC | Type: | --- |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Dave Malcolm
2005-06-09 16:18:31 UTC
The upstream patch functionality has been re-worked. I'd like to try to back-port it to 3.1.x but it might be too risky. I'll investigate. I have ideas myself that I may take a stab at implementing. I'll post here when my stuff is a bit more concrete. There is Synchronize with patch witch should give a lot more possibilities than the old apply patch. Do you think it is sufficient so we can close this bug? See http://download.eclipse.org/eclipse/downloads/drops/R-3.6-201006080911/eclipse-news-part1.html#TeamCVS for details (In reply to comment #2) > There is Synchronize with patch witch should give a lot more possibilities than > the old apply patch. Do you think it is sufficient so we can close this bug? I'm afraid I haven't used Eclipse in a while, so I can't really answer. IIRC, I made an effort to use Eclipse in my day-to-day workflow (C development, Fedora/RHEL packaging, autotooled projects) back in 2005, and filed various bugs relating to the difficult aspects, and I believe this was one of them. So it's difficult to say if this addresses the issue or not, perhaps it does. Feel free to close. Closing the bug in this case. There is no point in having open bug noone is going to test or look at. |