Bug 159979

Summary: Fix dangling pointer in acpi_pci_root_add()
Product: Red Hat Enterprise Linux 3 Reporter: Jim Paradis <jparadis>
Component: kernelAssignee: Jim Paradis <jparadis>
Status: CLOSED ERRATA QA Contact: Brian Brock <bbrock>
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3.0CC: bmaly, peterm, petrides
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: All   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: RHSA-2005-663 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-09-28 15:19:56 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:    
Bug Blocks: 156320    
Attachments:
Description Flags
Patch from upstream ACPI driver none

Description Jim Paradis 2005-06-09 21:04:09 UTC 
This is the RHEL3 equivalent of Bug 158920.  An error in adding a PCI root bus
can leave a dangling pointer on the global PCI root bus list, which can
subsequently crash the system.
Comment 1 Jim Paradis 2005-06-09 21:04:09 UTC 
Created attachment 115277 [details]
Patch from upstream ACPI driver
Comment 4 Ernie Petrides 2005-06-16 21:18:04 UTC 
Patch posted for review (by Jim) on 16-Jun-2005.
Comment 5 Ernie Petrides 2005-06-17 22:50:45 UTC 
A fix for this problem has just been committed to the RHEL3 U6
patch pool this evening (in kernel version 2.4.21-32.9.EL).
Comment 8 Martin Jenner 2005-08-30 15:43:22 UTC 
Following up on comment #6. Do we have a machine that triggers this for rhel3
you can suggest to use for testing errata ?
Comment 11 Red Hat Bugzilla 2005-09-28 15:19:56 UTC 
An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-2005-663.html