Bug 160047

Summary:	Anaconda sets graphic card to "ATI Mach 64" whereas it is a "ATI Rage XL"
Product:	Red Hat Enterprise Linux 4	Reporter:	David Tonhofer <bughunt>
Component:	hwdata	Assignee:	Bill Nottingham <notting>
Status:	CLOSED ERRATA	QA Contact:
Severity:	low	Docs Contact:
Priority:	medium
Version:	4.0	CC:	rvokal
Target Milestone:	---
Target Release:	---
Hardware:	x86_64
OS:	Linux
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version:	RHBA-2005-648	Doc Type:	Bug Fix
Doc Text:		Story Points:	---
Clone Of:		Environment:
Last Closed:	2005-10-05 16:32:51 UTC	Type:	---
Regression:	---	Mount Type:	---
Documentation:	---	CRM:
Verified Versions:		Category:	---
oVirt Team:	---	RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team:	---	Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:
Bug Depends On:
Bug Blocks:	156322

Description David Tonhofer 2005-06-10 14:01:03 UTC

From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.7.1) Gecko/20040707

Description of problem:
Install Red Hat ES on a Fujitsu-Siemens RX 300 S2, which has an on-motherboard
ATI Rage XL. lspci shows:

09:05.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL (rev 27)

After installation, X has been configured for an "ATI Mach 64". One can 
however manually choose the Rage XL in the list-of-cards.


Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):


How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. Install RH ES4 
2. Boot first time


Actual Results:  System is configured for ATI Mach 64

Expected Results:  System should be configured for ATI Rage XL

Additional info:

Comment 4 Bill Nottingham 2005-07-21 20:12:50 UTC

Fixed in 0.146.10.EL-1 and later.

Comment 7 Red Hat Bugzilla 2005-10-05 16:32:51 UTC

An advisory has been issued which should help the problem
described in this bug report. This report is therefore being
closed with a resolution of ERRATA. For more information
on the solution and/or where to find the updated files,
please follow the link below. You may reopen this bug report
if the solution does not work for you.

http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHBA-2005-648.html

Comment 8 David Tonhofer 2005-12-07 14:38:42 UTC

This still occurs with the "RH ES 4.0 update 2" installation CDs