Bug 1600897
Summary: | iksemel was removed from EPEL? | ||
---|---|---|---|
Product: | [Fedora] Fedora EPEL | Reporter: | Marko Bevc <marko.bevc> |
Component: | epel-release | Assignee: | Michael Stahnke <mastahnke> |
Status: | CLOSED DUPLICATE | QA Contact: | Fedora Extras Quality Assurance <extras-qa> |
Severity: | medium | Docs Contact: | |
Priority: | unspecified | ||
Version: | epel7 | CC: | dennis, kevin, mastahnke |
Target Milestone: | --- | ||
Target Release: | --- | ||
Hardware: | x86_64 | ||
OS: | Linux | ||
Whiteboard: | |||
Fixed In Version: | Doc Type: | If docs needed, set a value | |
Doc Text: | Story Points: | --- | |
Clone Of: | Environment: | ||
Last Closed: | 2018-07-13 18:16:55 UTC | Type: | Bug |
Regression: | --- | Mount Type: | --- |
Documentation: | --- | CRM: | |
Verified Versions: | Category: | --- | |
oVirt Team: | --- | RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host: | |
Cloudforms Team: | --- | Target Upstream Version: | |
Embargoed: |
Description
Marko Bevc
2018-07-13 10:28:42 UTC
It was indeed retired as a response to https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1594986. See that ticket and https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org/message/I5442Q55W7YE6ZFFDBZIUBE7KM2ZNTM3/ Though that probably should have gone to epel-devel as well, and probably should have been accompanied by at least a couple of bugs files against zabbix and asterisk. In any case, it should be trivial if someone really wants to revive it, though it would probably be better if everything adapted to work without it. Note that I have no interest in iksemel and don't even know what zabbix is; I just happened to notice the retirement and saw this ticket because all epel bugs get echoed to the #epel IRC channel. Thanks for the info! lets close this as a duplicate of 1594986 then. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 1594986 *** |