Bug 160143

Summary: disklessrc line 39 output e numeric value expected
Product: [Fedora] Fedora Reporter: ulrich
Component: system-config-netbootAssignee: Jason Vas Dias <jvdias>
Status: CLOSED CURRENTRELEASE QA Contact:
Severity: medium Docs Contact:
Priority: medium    
Version: 3CC: jvdias, walt
Target Milestone: ---   
Target Release: ---   
Hardware: i386   
OS: Linux   
Whiteboard:
Fixed In Version: 0.1.18 Doc Type: Bug Fix
Doc Text:
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: Environment:
Last Closed: 2005-08-25 10:03:46 UTC Type: ---
Regression: --- Mount Type: ---
Documentation: --- CRM:
Verified Versions: Category: ---
oVirt Team: --- RHEL 7.3 requirements from Atomic Host:
Cloudforms Team: --- Target Upstream Version:
Embargoed:

Description ulrich 2005-06-11 14:08:33 UTC
From Bugzilla Helper:
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.7.8) Gecko/20050513 Fedora/1.0.4-1.3.1 Firefox/1.0.4

Description of problem:
if a module failes to load in disklessrc loadmodules()
then disklessrc aborts with the following error:

disklessrc line 39 output e numeric value expected

in my case i tried a custom built kernel which has nfs compilied in,
so loading nfs module will fail, but the disklessrc should not abort.

the line 39 contains

return e;

should be written as

return $e;



Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
system-config-netboot-0.1.16-1_FC3

How reproducible:
Always

Steps to Reproduce:
1. build a custom kernel with nfs builtin
2. install kernel image and modules in diskless root
3. used updateDiskless to build initrd.img
4. install kernel vmlinuz and initrd.img in tftp dir
5..boot diskless client with new kernel image and initrd.img

Additional info:

Comment 1 Jason Vas Dias 2005-06-14 00:13:53 UTC
This bug is now fixed with system-config-netboot-0.1.18, soon to be
in FC-3 updates, but which meanwhile can be downloaded from :
http://people.redhat.com/~jvdias/system-config-netboot
Please try out the new version and let me know of any issues - thanks!

Comment 2 Walter Justen 2005-08-25 10:03:46 UTC
Thanks for the bug report. This particular bug was fixed and a update package
was published for download. Please feel free to report any further bugs you find.